Post News . Share Ideas . Inspire Innovation . Get Informed . Get Involved



Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2014

QUESTIONS ABOUT CANNON NOT NEW



Stuart Watson, investigative reporter from WCNC in Charlotte, has asked many of the right questions over the years to uncover some of the corruption in Charlotte local government.  Evidence has been in the public for years, but scant media coverage (apologies to Stuart Watson) and complete denial by current and past administrations has allowed corruption to fester.  This story is worth viewing if you haven't already seen it:




Judge Tyawdi Hands, Patrick Cannon and Trenna Cannon
Photo Credit:  Nancy Pierce, Charlotte BizJournals


See District Judge Tyawdi Hands (pictured on left) swearing Cannon (center) in as Mayor of Charlotte for his very short-lived time in office before arrest on Federal Charges.  

The Charlotte Observer did write an editorial about "problems" with Cannon's firm, E-Z Parking, not paying fair taxes.  They wrote it after the election.

Then there's the issue that Cannon faced tax liens of $193,000 with the Internal Revenue Service and "side-stepped" that information to voters. 

THIS  April 6, 2014 Charlotte Observer Article includes the following information about Cannon's history and refers to the recent affidavit for his federal charges:

The federal affidavit that outlines the bribery charges against Cannon also portrays him as a man untroubled with telling a lie.

The affidavit says an undercover agent pretending to be a business developer met with Cannon last June and Cannon agreed to lie to foreign investors on a trip to Las Vegas.

Cannon came up with an elaborate ruse, the affidavit alleged: He would claim he knew the undercover agents for years and had used his official position to help overcome challenges with city permits and zoning.

“Well, if it’s made up, I mean then it really wouldn’t matter,” Cannon is quoted as saying.
Questions about Cannon’s truthfulness came up as far back as 1999, during his first campaign for City Council.

In answers on an Observer questionnaire, Cannon wrote that he had never been charged with a crime. In fact, he was convicted in 1988 of failing to support an out-of-wedlock daughter. At the time, Cannon said he was so young he didn’t realize it was a criminal conviction, and didn’t know he owed child support.

During the campaign, he also listed his home as his mother’s house in the Pine Valley neighborhood. But neighbors said he didn’t live there and questioned whether he was eligible to represent the district. His license and voter registration listed the house, and nothing ever came of the complaints.

In 2005, Cannon withdrew from public life saying he needed more time with his family. In 2009, he decided to run for council again. Then the Observer discovered a series of IRS liens involving his parking company that totaled $193,553 between 2003 and 2008.

Even when the Observer questioned him, he wasn’t clear he had lied: “It’s unfortunate that people were misled about the truth rather than the facts during that particular time. But it was what it was, and we’ve moved on.”

That retreat from politics in 2005 also was one of the strangest moments in Cannon’s career.

Democrats thought Cannon was their best chance in years of unseating Pat McCrory. Then three months into the campaign, Cannon abruptly quit the race and also said he wouldn’t seek re-election to City Council.

He cited the deaths of an aunt and his wife’s grandmother, saying he wanted to focus on his family.

But was that the full truth? A salacious rumor had circulated for months about Cannon’s personal life.

In a farewell speech in December, Cannon acknowledged the gossip:

“I want to thank my family for their sacrifice that they’ve made, being both victims and praised for the 12 years I’ve been in office. My wife, especially, for enduring, oh in some cases, good times, but in some cases, bad times, particularly from one that dealt with the spread of vicious rumors that weren’t true, to assassinate my character on a matter that in my family’s mind as well as my own, is an abomination unto God, that also sent a few media outlets into wild-goose chases.”

He told the Observer the rumor was “an absolute lie.”

“If you do believe he had this pattern of dishonesty, which I do, after you get by with it for so long you just feel immune,” said a high-ranking city figure who worked with Cannon for more than 20 years.




Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/03/29/4804057/former-charlotte-mayor-patrick.html#.U0Dxd_ldWbE#storylink=cpy


The press is supposed to be part of keeping our officials honest.  But how many people even heard the allegations of dishonesty and tax fraud before Cannon was elected?  There was barely a mention in local news.

Before the FBI finishes, there are likely to be more locals sweating out investigations.  For the good of our City, let's hope they don't stop short.




Thursday, January 24, 2013

CMPD RELEASED 2012 CRIME STATISTICS


CHIEF MONROE’S STORY PROMOTING 24-HOUR SURVEILLANCE

During a 1/23/13 press conference, Charlotte’s Police Chief Rodney Monroe announced a 9.5% increase in violent crime for 2012, but according to WSOCTV, “Monroe hopes technology put in place for the DNC will help bring that number down this year.

Monroe went on to say the new Command Center had already helped close a murder case this year when “On Jan. 7 officers in the Hickory Grove Division were investigating a homicide on Farm Pond Lane. When police arrived, they found Monte Gay shot, and he was taken to the hospital, where he died.  Witnesses pointed police to a man named Bret Samuels, who was on electronic monitoring, and records showed he had been in the area of the shooting at the time.  Within two hours, police had a suspect in custody.”

Here are a couple of problems with his rationale:  1) The Command Center has been up and running for much of 2012, but crime statistics are up 9.5 % anyway, and 2) Electronic Ankle Bracelets have been in place and monitored for years.  If electronic monitoring is what caught the homicide suspect, it would not have required the DNC-funded Command Center.


2012 CREATIVE CRIME STATISTIC REPORTING

While it’s great that there were three less murders in 2012 than in 2011, much of the credit probably goes to paramedics and hospital staff—and to quick response of police officers responding to get those who were shot or stabbed to medical help.  The statistics on attempted murder are rolled into lesser charges.  Statistics for everyone who lived through 2012 in Charlotte are less encouraging:

Murders decreased 5.5 %
Rape    increased 4 %
Robbery  increased 12 %, with Armed Robbery increasing 14 %
Aggravated Assault  increased 9 %
Burglary is reported as down about 9 %
Larceny Totals are reported as  increasing about 6 %, with
Shoplifting  increasing over 18 % *
Vehicle Theft  Increased 2 %
Arson decreased 0.5 %
Overall:
Violent Crime Reported increased 9.5 %
Property Crime Reported increased 1.8 %


HOW MANY MURDERS WERE THERE IN 2012?

It’s hard to say what numbers are being reported.  If you examine the individual division numbers per CMPD’s site and add up the 2012 murder totals for each of 13 divisions, they total 49, not the 52 total given for the City for the year.  If three murders were committed somewhere outside of Divisions, but included in the totals, then what does that say about the validity of the rest of the crime numbers?  Or is there some other explanation for these two numbers not matching?

Similarly, adding up rapes reported among divisions brings a total of 205, but the City total is reported as 219.  There are 1635 robberies added up, vs. 1798 reported as the total.  Etcetera.  

Since CMPD is basing their reported increases and decreases in crime on these numbers, an explanation is in order.  If the total number of crimes reported as 38,014 for 2012 and 36,980 for 2011 are based on faulty, misleading, or just unclear reports or calculations, that needs to be clarified or corrected.


FREEDOM DIVISION: PINS FOR BEST 2012 CRIME REDUCTION

Chief Monroe applauded the Freedom Division for crime reduction and gave out pins to commemorate accomplishments.  Monroe said the Freedom Division demonstrated the best overall reduction at 3.5%.  However, violent crime was up 22.5% in Freedom, with Robbery up 31%, Rape up 8%, and Aggravated Assault up 22%.  Murders dropped from 4 in 2011 to 1 in 2012, and Burglary and Larceny statistics were way down.


COMPARE TO PROVIDENCE DIVISION, 2011 PIN WINNERS FOR BEST CRIME REDUCTION

Last year, Monroe began his pinning tradition by awarding them to Captain Martha Dozier and the Providence Division for a drop in 2011 reported crime statistics.  Now her 2012 Crime Statistics show:

Murders increased 67 %
Rape increased 30 %
Strong-armed Robbery increased 38 %
Aggravated Assault increased 12 %
Residential Burglary increased 11 %
Shoplifting increased 55 %  
with overall larceny increasing 6 %
Vehicle Theft increased 4 %
Arson increased 233 %


NOTE SIGNIFICANT INCREASES THIS YEAR IN SHOPLIFTING REPORTED

* The marked increase in reported shoplifting must be considered.  Last year, Citynewswatch reported the little-known SHOP (Shoplifting Offender Project) program employed by CMPD that seemed to be a way to keep larceny numbers off the books.  Inquiries to the State, FBI and CMPD to get accurate Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) statistics required by the FBI and other agencies hit dead ends in many cases, but maybe there was an internal response.  Only a full audit will tell for sure, but it would be a big coincidence if suddenly 20% more incidences of shoplifting started occurring after the diversion program was exposed.  Maybe it’s just a sign of the economic times or law enforcement focus.

If you read this SHOP post, you will see that the 2008 and 2009 CMPD Annual Reports have been removed from the web, and have not been returned.  Those are the first two years of Rodney Monroe’s tenure as Police Chief in Charlotte.  Why have they been removed?  What information is problematic?  2005, 2006, and 2007 are still present. 


PUBLIC STILL IN THE DARK

Watch Commander Logs, Significant Event Logs, and other major public crime information Chief Monroe had removed from the web site still hasn't been restored, and it doesn't look promising it will ever happen.



TOP SECRET STRETCHING

Millions have been spent on the DNC-funded “Command Center” used to install video cameras, microphones and “Shot Spotter” microphone systems, along with extra License Plate Reader's, or LPR’s (cameras that capture and store the locations and actions of tens of thousands of license plates of innocent travelers as they look for a few possible violators).  Monroe still won’t release any Operating Procedures for these devices, who is authorized to use them, who is authorized to access the data, how long it will be stored, whether the data is being uploaded to any outside agencies or companies, or what the total costs are.  There is no data to substantiate the use of this equipment or data, and now Monroe is claiming the old electronic monitoring ankle bracelets are part of the new technology—making any claim necessary to associate catching a murder suspect with his expensive Command Center.

The CMPD and City STILL have not released dollars spent on this “top-secret” technology for security reasons, according to Police Chief Rodney Monroe and recently-retired City Manager Curt Walton.  Tax payers were told they had to wait until after the DNC Convention first week of September, 2012, ended to be told how the security dollars had been spent.  More than four months later, is there still a security threat to the visiting dignitaries last Fall?

No.

The finances for security spending still haven’t been disclosed.


Monday, March 12, 2012

Sunshine Week

Courtesy Don Landgren, Jr. of Worcester Telegram & Gazette
Check out this site
Click here to go to site
for many resources about rights and responsibilities of the press and government in giving public information about what our government is doing. 


On July 10, 2010, the General Assembly enacted 2010 N.C. Sess. Laws c. 169 (HB 961)(the Act).  Governor Purdue supported this Act and it is commonly referred to as the “Sunshine Law” in keeping with the long history of trying to open the actions of government officials to the government those officials represent.  This session law also references General Statute 132 (previously in place) which specifically deals with Public Records.  Both can be viewed at the NC Legislature’s web site:  http://ncleg.net/
GS 132 includes provisions to force payment to attorneys for public records improperly denied.  There are penalties that may be assessed personally to each person to denied the records, for each day they denied them.
Unfortunately, many critical issues in Charlotte remain dark and cloudy as City Council knowingly permits the use of City resources, such as city attorneys and other employees, to block release of important and basic information about Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department operations, from financial transactions to crime statistics about what’s really happening in our city.
The CMPD should not be hiding—or permitted to hide—information about crime, spending, personnel problems, shifting funds approved only by one man, missing police cars/equipment, and more.
It will be interesting to see if any of the major network or newspapers step up during this “Sunshine Week” and expose even the most basic operations of government in Charlotte at this critical time.  The information is available for finding.
A little more sunshine in Charlotte is needed.  And the stories are coming, with or without the help of the usual media sources.

See this re-cap of some major issues that need answers.
Please keep in touch.  Please remain patient.  Thanks to everyone.


Thursday, February 16, 2012

Chief Monroe & City of Charlotte Fight NC DOJ Request for Crime Data, too

 Maybe other members of the press or attorneys can ask for this information and get answers: Chief Monroe, Curt Walton and the rest still refuse to release basic public crime data afforded by public record law and specifically requested.  citynewswatch has records forwarded and confirmed that even the NC Department of Justice and FBI have been unable to pry the statistics from CMPD. 

See the complete list requested from CMPD Attorney Mark Newbold below.  What is the reason that Ms. Nguyen, who runs CMPD computer analysis can’t simply send the information upon request?  There is no legitimate reason. 

There’s probably a huge amount of wasted money and even just computer processing time and storage space on ridiculous repeated requests for information that City officials are fighting.  There’s only one reason to try to keep this secret and it’s not good.

Date: Mon, Nov 14, 2011
Subject: UCR statistics

Dear Ms. Nguyen,

I have read an article where DC Putney said that the FBI found some errors on CMPD reports.  Do you have a quantification of those errors? 

I don't know if it's related to those same numbers or not, but since the CMPD does its own review, are there any reports that show the adjustments made at the end of the year after CMPD makes any corrections to reports vs. what was reported during the year? 

I would appreciate any information.  Thank you.

Here is the article.  I just need the numbers I asked for and the audit report or reports involved, whether FBI review and/or CMPD review.  DC Putney did not respond, so I sent my request to the personnel who track all the crime numbers, according to your website.

Thanks very much.


Police: Crime stats accurate
Cleve R. Wootson Jr.
Posted: Friday, Jan. 07, 2011

Charlotte-Mecklenburg police use the same crime-tracking system that has come under fire for accuracy problems in other cities, but department officials say they believe their crime statistics are accurate.

Local police are thoroughly trained in how to accurately classify and record crime, says Deputy Chief Kerr Putney. Supervisors review officers' initial crime reports to help ensure accuracy, and the department conducts periodic audits.

"You've got to trust your people...," says Putney. “We don't have a lot of instances where people are misclassifying or falsifying or underreporting crime."

The FBI recently reviewed a small sample of CMPD crime reports and made only minor suggestions to improve uniformity of reporting, Putney said. But the FBI's review did not raise questions of accuracy.

Putney says the department sees no need for an independent audit of Charlotte's crime statistics like the one underway in New York. Critics there and elsewhere say the "Comp stat" computer crime-tracking system encourages officers to underreport and misclassify crimes- so they don't face possible consequences for reporting increases in crime. 

Putney says CMPD is confident that the dramatic decline they’ve recorded in Charlotte crime is accurate. The department has recently reported record lows in crime since the department began keeping uniform records in 1977. Chief Rodney Monroe has said the decline stems from a variety of factors including improved police tactics, better crime-mapping and other socio-economic shifts.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011
Captain Cunningham,

I HAVE USED CAPITAL LETTERS TO MAKE READING EASIER.
THESE ARE THE NUMBERS I AM LOOKING FOR FROM MY ORIGINAL REQUEST:

I have read an article where DC Putney said that the FBI found some errors on CMPD reports. Do you have a quantification of those errors?

I don't know if it's related to those same numbers or not, but since the CMPD does its own review, are there any reports that show the adjustments made at the end of the year after CMPD makes any corrections to reports vs. what was reported during the year?

PLEASE ASK MS. NGUYEN FOR THE DATA.
THESE ARE THE AUDITS:

Supervisors review officers' initial crime reports to help ensure accuracy, and the department conducts periodic audits. 

"You've got to trust your people...," says Putney.  "We don't have a lot of instances where people are misclassifying or falsifying or underreporting crime."

The FBI recently reviewed a small sample of CMPD crime reports and made only minor suggestions to improve uniformity of reporting, Putney said. But the FBI's review did not raise questions of accuracy.

ARE YOU SAYING THE CMPD DOES NOT HAVE THE FBI REPORT?
PLEASE GIVE ME THE NUMBERS I HAVE ASKED FOR.

THANK YOU.


On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:10 PM,

Mr. Walton,

Is there any difficulty in understanding the reports and numbers exactly as I have described them? Captain Cunningham says he doesn't understand what has been requested. Please find someone who does and have them send the numbers and reports.

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011
Mr. Walton,

I am asking for very little information, all of which should be available.

Please send the information promptly. It shouldn't be necessary to keep asking, and to be refused.

If you refuse to send it, then you must give me an explanation for the denial, as Public Records Law dictates.


date: Sat, Dec 3, 2011

Chief Monroe,

I have sent this request and been patient for weeks trying to get this information, but your Public Affairs officer Captain Brian Cunningham wrote to me that he doesn't understand anything about the numbers I asked for.  Kerr Putney, who said he reviewed the data, didn't respond.  Ms. Nguyen--who should have the information also--didn't give the data.  Please assign whoever has the data to send it. 

Thank you.


Date: Wed, Dec 7, 2011

Mr. Walton,

Captain Brian Cunningham has still not provided this information. This is public information which you are required to provide.


Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011
To: Cunningham, Brian

Subject: Re: CMPD Year-End UCR Statistics

Officer Cunningham,

I'm sure you are aware that the report sent by Officer Williams is not the information I have asked you for.

Officer Williams obviously has the information, and I suspect you do by now as well. He said "I compile the UCR reports for CMPD. Captain Cunningham asked that I contact you and provide you with the 2010 Year-End UCR Summary Report." This obviously isn't what I asked you for. He also said "Please let me know if you need any further assistance," but when I did, he continues to refuse to do that.

He is in the "Crime Analysis Division, UCR/NIBRS" so he should have the numbers.

Please send to me what I asked for instead of having your officer run interference. Thank you.


It seems Captain Cunningham really didn’t like it that other people were notified about his blocking the information for Chief Monroe, but you should interpret for yourself the email he sent in giant, obnoxious type, saying that nobody understood the items Deputy Chief Putney referred to in the article or basic crime statistics:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Cunningham, Brian <bcunningham@cmpd.org>
Date: Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:21 AM
Subject: RE: CMPD Year-End UCR Statistics

I will explain this again and keep it real simple so we can work through this. Call me at 704-336-4098, I will try to help you anyway possible. No one knows what you are talking about so please just focus on dealing with me and not emailing others. All Public Records requests come through my office for approval. I hope you can understand and I hope to hear from you soon. Brian

Captain Brian Cunningham

CMPD-Public Affairs Director


Requests for assistance have involved the NC Department of Justice.  Ms. Narcissa Woods has made a clear request for the list of public information below to CMPD Attorney Mark Newbold:

Woods, Narcissi Nwoods@ncdoj.gov

Jan 11, 2012

I have emailed your request to Mark Newbold of the Charlotte City Attorney’s office.
Regards,
Narcisa Woods
Victims & Citizens Services Section

North Carolina Attorney General's Office
(919) 716-6780
(919) 716-6705 Fax

 E-mails in connection with public business, are public records and may be disclosed to third parties

Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012
To: Woods, Narcisa
Subject: List of items-- thanks.

Dear Ms. Woods,

Here is a partial quote from the full Charlotte Observer article already provided to CMPD and City of Charlotte officials in which Deputy Chief Kerr Putney discussed crime statistic audits, changing crime reports, and the accuracy of crime statistics.  After that is a bulletized list that I hope simplifies things and if there are any more questions, please do not hesitate to contact me again.  Thank you so much for your assistance.

Partially quoting the newspaper article:

"We don't have a lot of instances where people are misclassifying or falsifying or underreporting crime."  
The FBI recently reviewed a small sample of CMPD crime reports and made only minor suggestions to improve uniformity of reporting, Putney said. But the FBI's review did not raise questions of accuracy.  Putney says CMPD is confident that the dramatic decline they've recorded in Charlotte crime is accurate. 

·       DC Putney clearly stated that there is an internal audit of these reports– I would like a copy of the audit

·       How many instances was he referring to when he said “we don’t have a lot of instances … misclassifying or falsifying or underreporting crime?"

·       Putney said there was an FBI review – I would like a copy of that FBI review or any results from their review

·       Putney said that supervisors review the numbers as well, and that changes are made to indicate corrections.  I would like to see all of those reports that were changed so that I can see why they were changed and how they were changed by supervisors.

·       I would like the annual numbers of reported crimes by category as they were reported before corrections were made and then as they were reported after corrections were made for 2010 and 2011   

·       I would like the totals by classification and numbers of CALLS FOR SERVICE for all calls, and how they relate to classification and numbers of CRIMES REPORTED, also for 2010 and 2011

Thank you very much


You can see that this last item is maybe the most important in discerning what is going on with the reporting of crime in Charlotte.  Comparing what citizens are reporting to what Chief Monroe is reporting is important and relevant, and perhaps why he is fighting so hard not to release information.

Here we stand in mid-February, 2012.  It is over a year since Cleve Wootson wrote his article about the questionable crime statistics.  It has been three years since Chief Monroe stood up on in front of Charlotte’s City Council and claimed there was a legitimate drop in crime, with no changes in the way CMPD was reporting, and no pressure on officers to underreport crime. 

It has been three ½ months since this latest specific request was input, but Monroe, Walton, and lawyers we are paying for are fighting even the North Carolina Department of Justice to keep the real numbers secret.

The one piece of information turned over was a State Audit which found A state audit found regarding CMPD “State Program had staff assigned to conduct audits:  NO”, deficient of standards.  Also, only 61 reports were reviewed from CMPD.

Also, the state found that “CMPD did not correctly submit Quarterly Hate Crime Reports.”

This public information must all be turned over immediately in an attempt to lend any legitimacy to Monroe’s claims of huge drops in the crime rate here.

It is incumbent upon City Council to produce this information, which could be done in a matter of minutes with the multi-million dollar computer information system Monroe guided Charlotte to purchase from his old business associate.

Monday, February 6, 2012

HERE’S A RE-CAP OF SOME CHARLOTTE POLICE ISSUES TO HELP THE NEW CITY COUNCIL (AND THE OLD ONE)

Most of the previous City Council recently admitted they were barely paying attention and had no idea they voted to give approval for City Manager Curt Walton to contract $50 Million of our money with zero oversight and zero disclosure (so far).

It seems like a good idea to remind the old council members and point out to new ones some very serious issues with lack of CMPD oversight.  It’s obvious the lack of accountability reaches far beyond this singular $50 Million issue of a police state that has been authorized, so let’s review a few:

INTRODUCTION OF A LONG LIST
Accurate Crime information, a fairly secret program (SHOP Shoplifting Offender Project) to keep crime statistics off the books, proper personnel decisions, contracting issues with vendors even outside the $50 Million in DNC 2012 contracts, truthfulness in statements from ‘leadership,’ millions in grant and budget money allocated for questionable spending while most police officers get no raises, equipment purchased from vendors with past relationships with the Chief of Police (with equipment that doesn’t work properly), documented recruiting standards changed while the police chief publicly says they have not been, missing police cars…  here is a look back to some of those items with a hope that Mayor Foxx and City Council will get answers and give them to the public, as they are chartered to do.

TRANSPARENCY & PUBLIC RECORDS IN GENERAL
Starting with the most urgent overall problem, the CMPD is operating in whatever level of secrecy Chief Monroe calls for instead of the appropriate level of public transparency.
Public Records Laws are being held in absolute contempt, and to date, no City Council Member or Mayor has shown the leadership to hold the City Manager accountable.

The City Council Code of Ethics spells out exactly the need for City leaders to hold the Manager and Police Chief responsible.  Part of section 5 states:

They should also remember that local government records belong to the public and not to them or City employees.
In order to ensure strict compliance with the laws concerning openness, the Mayor and Council members should make clear that an environment of transparency and candor is to be maintained at all times in the governmental unit. They should prohibit unjustified delay in fulfilling public records requests.

GENERAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE CODE OF ETHICS
The stability and proper operation of democratic reporesentative government depend upon public confidence in the integerity of the government and upon responsible exercise of the trust conferred by the people upon their elected officials.
A link to the full Code of Ethics is posted at right.

CRIME STATISTICS AT THE TOP OF THE LIST
There is a multi-part series about crime statistics contained on this site (Links to all segments are on the right side of the page or use SEARCH THIS SITE for Crime Statistics Part 1, Part 2...).  The first piece, “Crime Reporting Questions and Jealous Reporters?” has to do with Monroe’s really odd accusations that reporters might just be jealous of him as a motivation for asking for the real crime numbers.  Monroe had removed information from the public shortly after arriving as Chief of Police for Charlotte, then quickly claimed radical drops in crime at the same time refusing to release the raw data and denying he had made any changes in reporting methods.  The public has been trying to get that information back ever since.

It’s very hard to take Chief Monroe’s claims of dramatic crime reduction every year he’s been her seriously when he refuses to show the actual numbers and reports his claims are based on.

“Crime Reporting Questions and Jealous Reporters?” is also an extensive explanation of why it’s so important to get the classification of Type I and Type II crimes correct, not only for accuracy and because it’s the legal thing to do, but because grant money, staffing levels, and other critical decisions are based on the accurate reporting of the serious, Type I crimes for our city.

The CMPD Attorney’s Office gave information that Calls for Service for the year totaled 360,743, even though many other sources put the real number closer to a million.  They refuse to explain the discrepancy.

Chief Monroe told City Council there had been no changes in the way crime was being reported, but CMPD reports have footnotes stating that there have been changes as well as that CMPD numbers may not follow UCR reporting standards.

In addition to that, despite Monroe hiding the data, numerous examples of falsely reporting the type and severity of crime have been identified.

The most urgent daily issue may be the years of crime data that has been suppressed by Chief Monroe.  We need to know the information he has removed and has refused to supply through public records requests as well:

This post has a good explanation of all the information we need and why, but here is some of what has been removed over the last few years, and is mostly not available still:
1) Calls for service
2) Significant Event Log
3) Correct Uniform Crime Reporting Numbers, as they relate directly to the numbers above
4) Internal Affairs reports
5) Minutes of the Civil Service Board
6) Complete Police Department Budget

Read here where Chief Monroe’s Public Affairs Captain, Brain Cunningham, promised a citizen in 2010 that the CMPD web site was ‘under construction’ and the information would be back up soon.  The misinformation out of that office is frustrating, at best.

POOR CRIME REPORTING/PUBLIC CORRUPTION CHARGES COMPSTAT
This Part 5 post describes one reason “Why Every Citizen Should Care about Crime Reporting” and explains about a situation in New York, the birthplace of the CompStat computerized statistical reporting system which is also used here in Charlotte.  The pressure from the brass seemed to lead to underreporting of crime and in an illustrative case led directly to a serial rapist allowed to continue raping women because some earlier crimes were downgraded on reports.

It is also the story of hero cop Adrian Schoolcraft who tried to reform his department of the bad practices, but was instead attacked, dragged out of his home one Halloween by about a dozen uniformed and Brass in blue, labeled insane and locked away from all contact with the outside world for several days to intimidate him.  If he hadn’t had second tape recorder going of the terrifying events where he was essentially told he should have known better than to tell on his fellow cops, things might be very different for him now.  Other officers are stepping up to support him, but the charges of public corruption because public officials knew of the wrong practices and conspired to hide it are still under investigation.

"CompState, Investigations, Crime Statistics Part 6" continues the Schoolcraft story, but goes into more depth about the Comptstat system investigation into corruption in NY, and also how the numbers in Charlotte don’t seem to be correct.  There have been allegations of career damage here in Charlotte, too, whether anyone has been dragged off to a mental ward to intimidate them or not.
 
ISSUES WITH VENDOR CONTRACTS
Nearly unbelievably, on Feb. 9, 2009, Chief Monroe stood before City Council and explained how he thought the concept of ‘predictive analytics’ would be something to explore for use in police work.  A contract worth millions was awarded to Information Builders to produce a system for CMPD, which Monroe and his Deputy Chief Harold Medlock gave presentations to advertise—won awards for, as a matter of fact.  Those awards seem to be just more promotion for the company.  

The unbelievable part is that Monroe not only knew all about Information Builders at the time he spoke to council, but he had previously worked with them and advertised for them for years as Chief of Police in Richmond, VA.  There’s no word if direct compensation was involved, but with the odd subterfuge and multimillion-dollar contract involved, maybe someone should double check.

Even worse, the computer programs apparently don’t work for most officers on the streets because they take so long to boot up (nearly half an hour) that most officers reportedly don’t use the system in their cars.  It’s largely used by upper-level employees to prepare for those often-brutal Compstat meetings to try to get reported numbers down.

TASER CONTRACTS REALLY A MESS
This latest deal with TASER is really a difficult-to-describe mess.  Several posts on this site contain explanation of how Monroe met with TASER, Inc. officials to celebrate closing the sale of almost $2 Million of new TASERS before City Council voted to approve the sale.
Next came a ridiculous response from CMPD Attorney Judy Emken attempting to justify signing of contracts with no effective dates on them, contracts she said weren’t signed when they apparently had been, and contracts signed more than a month after TASER was advertising shipment of the sale to CMPD (without the required separate contract allowing advertising), followed up with Emken’s letter saying the person requesting must be “confused” by all the irregular contracts—along with letters that went unanswered to the Mayor and Council about the whole situation.

Then, the PERF consulting review that was supposed to be part of the decision-making matrix to buy the TASER X-2’s was obtained, and clearly states that the X-2 purchase decision was made prior to their involvement, contrary to what Monroe presented to Council and the public.

Rodney Monroe told council he did competitive searches and also looked for opportunities to lease.  We’d like to see the paperwork on that.

CHIEF RODNEY MONROE STATES HIS EXPERIENCE
Having Rodney Monroe in charge of DNC 2012 security may be an issue when he stated in interviews he had more experience than he may have had.  See this link to watch the WSOC interview where he claimed he had been in charge of security for two presidential inaugurations and the Million Man March in Washington, DC.  However, since he made that first claim and citynewswatch announced that even based on his own prior statements, he only headed security for the 1992 Presidential Inauguration and the Million Man March, Monroe has ceased stating he headed the third event.  citynewswatch has not been able to confirm independent of Monroe’s prior statements that he headed the other two events, either.

Maybe this experience is in his background check, conducted by Waters Consulting Company, Inc., conducted before Monroe was hired by Curt Walton in 2008, confirmed by City Council and the Mayor.  Monroe also admitted publicly that he had been dishonest on his resume and stated he had received a degree in Criminal Justice, though the degree awarded to him was in in Interdisciplinary Studies.  He later said he was trying to convey that he had taken an emphasis in Criminal Justice, however it was discovered that he only took 6 credit hours out of his 120 at Virginia Commonwealth University. 

VCU later admitted they shouldn’t have awarded him a degree, but declined to take it back and mostly took responsibility for Chief Monroe not being able to read and understand the graduation requirements.  Most of Monroe’s credit hours were from an on-line college, paid with reimbursement from the municipality.  Public records requests for these reimbursements, said to exceed allowed amount, are in large part how the entire degree scandal that took out several top VCU officials was exposed.
 
Monroe announced four years ago when he came here that he would take coursework at a college here to earn his degree.   Strangely, about a year after that, Monroe told Richmond, VA magazine Style Weekly he had already completed 18 credit hours toward his Master’s degree.  However, he never mentioned that when numerous reporters here in Charlotte asked him if he had begun taking the rest of his undergraduate work yet.  There is no independent confirmation of these Masters classes he referred to.

WBTV recently aired an editorial on the topic, explaining they felt he shouldn’t have “an incomplete” and should to take the undergraduate classes that were a job requirement, after all.  The undergraduate degree is a minimum job requirement for many lower-level jobs in the police force as well. 

When someone set up for a private security company in Charlotte to get paid DNC security money for training to benefit that private company, citynewswatch did a story about it.  Metro Security had been on television to explain how they would be getting public money to get training that would benefit this private security company.  This seemed like the wrong strategy when money could have gone to our police officers who are continually told there is no money for raises.  The coverage included Metro Security’s Craigslist posting for new employees to pay them for this training, and then get paid $8.50/hour.  This seemed ill-conceived as top-level security by the nation’s best.

WHAT DID THE BACKGROUND CHECK SAY?
With so many issues that keep coming up about Monroe’s background and ongoing issues, it causes questions about what was in the background check commissioned by Charlotte before his hiring.  Were these issues disclosed in the background check done by the company hired to investigate Monroe before he came here?  Did City Manager Curt Walton know everything there was to know and approve the hiring anyway?  What about Council and the Mayor?  OR did the consulting company not do a thorough check? 

Even though some personnel matters are generally kept sealed, the City Manager is permitted to unseal a background check if it becomes a matter of public trust.

Charlotte has spent millions of dollars already on lawsuits Monroe has stated he should have done things differently on (ex: Marcus Jackson cases).  There was a great deal of money spent on the lawsuit regarding the First 48 Television Show.

With the records of over 500 officers records missing from Charlotte’s Police Academy now, it seems we deserve to take a good look at qualifications.

One only has to check the newspapers or do a little checking with the feds to see that there was a federal lawsuit filed over grant money Monroe was in charge of two jobs ago, as Police Chief in Macon, GA.

FEDERAL FUNDS FOR AT RISK YOUTH SUBJECT OF FEDERAL INVESTIGATION & SETTLEMENT AFTER CRIMINAL CHARGES
The Macon Telegraph has numerous articles on the subject of federal funds intended to go directly to help troubled and at-risk youth. However, much of the money was allegedly used for unapproved purchases and to pay salaries for people, despite that it was not a permitted use. Other money was just plain unaccounted for.

Eventually, the small city of Macon settled for $1,000,000. 

Charlotte has numerous programs with large funds intended to go directly to help troubled and at-risk youth.

Of course, Chief Monroe likes to mix up his charity work and sports.  Read this post and see, but he does not like to answer financial questions, no matter how much public money goes into organizations.  This needs to change immediately.  Open the books.  It’s the law.

MORE MISSING MONEY
Since August of last year, Council won’t disclose why they approved another $600,000 for what Monroe called a “command center ‘upfit’.”  This money was spent out of Asset Forfeiture so it was supposed to be approved ahead of spending, but seems they may have been approving money already spent last year.

Later, Councilman Barnes made a show at the CC meeting of saying he had some concerns, but they had been addressed. There was no public statement of what his concerns were or how they were addressed.  The public is still in the dark.

Similarly, when Deputy Chief Graue stated to City Council that the Department had no idea what happened to 50 brand new police cars—about $2,000,000 minimum value.  Based on their refusal to say who is driving certain cars, and reports that some part-time employees and others that shouldn’t have the cars have been driving them home, they probably know where they are, but would rather not tell us.  It’s the least disturbing of all options. 

Were they sold for cash for someone’s personal benefit?  Are terrorists driving around in police cars?  Is Rodney Monroe so incompetent that even three months later he still can’t have his staff find 50 brand new police cars? 

This is inventory, folks.  Expensive inventory.  And we have a right to demand to know where those cars are.  We paid for them.  There’s another $2,000,000 or more that could have gone toward police raises.

PERSONNEL PROBLEMS
The Human Resources Department that should process employee complaints just stated they refused to get involved.  They are certainly aware of discrimination, retaliation, and other complaints within the police department.  How is it acceptable for HR to say “we won’t take any action?”

City Manager Curt Walton seemed to orchestrate an intentionally delayed response with Chief Monroe and his Public Affairs Office when asked about raises, promotions, fairness of testing and promotions, positions that were not in CMPD Directives, and other issues.  Curt Walton refused to answer until a few MINUTES after Monroe announced the promotions, and even then tried to refer to Directives which didn’t exist.

Since then, Sergeant Tammy Hatley has won her lawsuit where a judge found the CMPD clearly violated her right to due process in related issues.  Others that were waiting to see how her lawsuit turned out are said to be in negotiations for related settlements and/or considering their own suits.
 
Then there’s the ongoing EEOC Federal investigation.

All of this Federal scrutiny is a good thing since City of Charlotte officials seem either completely unwilling or incapable of cleaning up their own behavior.  This is the best time for officers who have been too afraid of losing their pensions and jobs to speak up.

CMPD Attorney Mark Newbold has given an unrelated prior talk about how important is not to retaliate against employees once they have filed a complaint on the job.  Those guidelines should be in place before complaints are filed and should be stressed especially right now at CMPD.  Careful adherence to this policy should be stressed since so many officers are afraid to talk in the current atmosphere of widespread retaliation.
  
STILL WAITING TO GET BLUE HORNETS FINANCE INFORMATION
For half a year, using the full force of the CMPD Attorneys, his Public Affairs team, the City Attorneys, and the City Council to back him up (inexplicably) Rodney Monroe has absolutely refused to reveal the funding sources and outlets for the CMPD Blue Hornets Baseball Team. 

The non-profit company set up to receive and distribute money for the team is the “Great Balls of Fire Foundation, Inc,” in the name of Deputy Chief David Graham.  Board Member and designated contact for the group is Major Paul ZInkann.  The group receives public money and is therefore subject to release of this information. 

First, Public Affairs Captain (and the web site) Brian Cunningham claimed the players took care of all their own expenses. Asset Forfeiture funds labeled “team charlo” exceed $60,000 and CMPD refuses to answer whether those or another $5,000 in “monogramming” AF funds were used for the Team, though is seems likely and would very likely not be allowed per federal law. (Asset Forfeiture spending is a topic unto itself).

Also, covert donations from sponsors to police organizations should not be allowed—this is a safety consideration and also involves potential influence on lucrative security contracts.

Deputy Chief David Graham receiving the benefits of a tax shelter for what appears to be hundreds of thousands of write-offs related to public money going through the police department may be a conflict that should be resolved as well, particularly when the participants are not disclosed.

FIRST 48 TELEVISION SHOW
Major Zinkann was also intricately involved for Chief Monroe in the making of the First 48 television production about police officers in Charlotte.  At that time,  Chief Monroe signed away the perpetual rights of all police officers, on- and off-duty, as well as encumbering the City of Charlotte in numerous ways, by signing a contract for a television show about police work which had already proven to be risky to possibly deadly in other cities before he did so.

Even though legal responsibilities of the City of Charlotte City Council include signing contracts on behalf of the City, there was not any other city signature other than Monroe, who at the time had his close assistant (now Deputy Chief) Vicki Foster working with him on the show as well.  She and her live-in security guard company partner Melvin Keys were pitching a “security guard reality show” to production companies at the same time, regardless of CMPD regulations on secondary employment.

CMPD Attorney Mark Newbold, in accordance with the City Manager and City Attorney, intentionally withheld Chief Monroe’s correspondence from a public records request about this entire matter, with the exception of one email of no consequence (and the contract he signed).  There is separate documentation showing that Newbold instructed others not to ask Monroe for his correspondence to respond to public records requests.  If Newbold ever asked Monroe for it himself, it was not ultimately provided.  You can read in the post what seems to be a strategy of keeping Monroe out of documented trouble as much as possible.

OFFICER SECURITY AND THE ACADEMY
Chief Monroe has denied since Cedarposts.blogspot.com broke the story back in mid-September that CMPD Officers’ personnel records are missing from the Police Academy and possibly other locations.  After asking the Department of Justice to intervene, they released a partial memo that was a clear admission the records of numerous officers were missing, but wouldn’t say how many or answer questions about the implications of the missing records for officers’ certifications, cases, security, or other important issues.

citynewswatch has now learned that over 500 Officers’ records are known missing, though the last known time they were secure has not been established yet. 

How does the Chief of Police that will be heading security for DNC manage to have records for 500 Officers disappear under his nose from his Police Academy?  Were they intentionally removed?   Is it true that the Academy has now lost certification and the next recruit classes are canceled?

More than one blog—here and at Cedarposts.blogspot.com—lent a written voice for officers about the security risk and wasted expense of the mandatory CMPD “Yearbook” photos Monroe tried to instate.  Raising this concern publicly seemed to cause the change in policy to make it non-mandatory, but it shouldn’t have taken place at all.
 
In addition to the waste of money and security risk, it seems even officers who paid to get a yearbook haven’t received them half a year later.  What happened to the money?  What photographer and printing company were involved and was there competition, or was this another “recommendation from on high?”  We’d like to see the paperwork on this one, too.

“CUSTOMER SATISFACTION”
Depending on what part of Charlotte you live in, your experience with crime and with the police will probably be quite different.  See what happened when a wealthy campaign donor had an irritating problem with pranksters stealing $7.50 plastic campaign signs from the grassy area out front of her house.  She placed a call to Patrick Cannon, who called his good buddy Rodney Monroe, and then Captain Martha Dozier set up her division with a multi-day undercover sting, cameras in unmarked cars behind bushes.  Estimated cost to the tax payers:  minimum $15,000. 

By contrast, a group of active neighbors on the West side Camp Greene neighborhood looking for a little information and support to keep a 75 bed parole house for violent convicted felons from moving in next to their churches and schools could not get a single response from Police, the Mayor, or any sitting Council Member.

Conducting the Citizen Survey this past year, Monroe used tax money to ask people if they had seen a police car in their neighborhood in the past year.  Guess what:  76% of respondents had seen one.  Brilliant use of our money.
 
Out of about 1 million calls to 911 per year, only 27 respondents were rated on their satisfaction with the police on how they were treated.

45% of the people were from the wealthiest, lowest-crime area in Charlotte: the Southeast Division.  And, 72% live in a single-family detached home, with another 11% in a condo or townhome.  It shouldn’t be a big surprise that most of those people felt pretty safe.  In past years, respondents were evenly split among Divisions, but maybe Monroe knew that wouldn’t produce good results.  Even these results were questionable.

·       Fear of Break-ins and Burglary JUMPED from 25% in 2008 to 38% in 2011
·       Fear of Assault, Rape, & Robbery SKYROCKETED from 12% in 2008 to 37% in 2011
·       Fear of Murder has gone up, too

Charlotte is certainly not as rough as the area of D.C. where Chief Monroe had cut his teeth as commander in a very rough area.  Here’s an example of his leadership there:
The information we’re entitled to here in Charlotte, and with the Public Records Laws we have now, is quite different than what is portrayed in this Washington, D.C. story.  Internal Affairs and peer reporting should be quite different than the scenario in this reporter’s story.  What are we really getting in our Police Leadership?  Is it different now?

We deserve the answers.  So do our officers who haven’t had a real raise in three years, while millions of dollars are funneled into Monroe’s special projects, special hires, and special cars—not to mention the lawsuits his leadership has encountered.

With City Council going on luxury vacations at $513/night, Mayor Foxx hiring yet another assistant at maybe $72,000/year, $2,000,000 in new TASERS most officers say are bulky and were unnecessary to begin with, $5,000,000 for new cars when the Chief says he can’t find $2,000,000 in other brand new cars we already have, and the list goes on…

It’s frustrating to put your life on the line to be a Police Officer with no raises for years, unfair hiring and promotion practices (proven in court lack of due process), allegations of EEOC violations, allegations of retaliatory job transfers and demotions, Internal Affairs investigations opened on the Chief of Police with no known completion, covering up crimes allegedly committed by police officers until they are discovered by the public, seemingly voiding arrests of police officers allegations of brass level employees being permitted to drag employees in and abuse them for false beliefs they have supplied (truthful) information about them to another person, retaliatory disciplinary action, and refusing to have financial accountability for any actions taken.

Dear City Council,
Please account for all this missing money.
Please take any diverted or wasted funds and set them aside exclusively for raises for our officers that have not had a raise in years, despite the City Manager voting himself large bonuses and raises and Chief Monroe giving raises to his brass level employees, often under questionable circumstances.
Please release all crime information.
Please release all financial information for any “charitable” organizations related to the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department.
Please investigate the personnel issues in the CMPD.
Please create a safe ombudsman for police and civilians alike to contact to report issues related to the police department that need investigation, including an anonymous mechanism if necessary.
Please investigate the connections between contracts awarded for police work and those in the police department.

Thank you.