Post News . Share Ideas . Inspire Innovation . Get Informed . Get Involved



Showing posts with label TASER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TASER. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

RECENTLY RETIRED POLICE CHIEFS' FINANCIAL TIES TO TASER INTERNATIONAL AFTER $MILLIONS IN CITY PURCHASES

CITY OF CHARLOTTE'S 'COMPETITIVE BID' FOR MILLIONS IN BODY CAMERAS


The message to Charlotte City Council and Citizens is that the most recent multi-million dollar contract with TASER was done through competitive bid process and received only one bid.  But a quick review of the Invitation to bid (scroll down to page 37) makes it clear that TASER was the only manufacturer considered:
Charlotte's "invitation to bid" for ONLY TASER products




TASER HIRED TWO RETIRED CHIEFS AS CONSULTANT AND IN TALKS WITH THIRD, AFTER EACH CHIEF RECOMMENDED PURCHASES IN THE $MILLIONS

Citynewswatch located this excellent article on TASER's ties to various police chiefs around the country who  have retired then signed consulting contracts  with TASER after recent retirements:

See   http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=33680550 by KTL from March 3, 2015 and read part of the article here:

IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) — Taser International, the stun-gun maker emerging as a leading supplier of body cameras for police, has cultivated financial ties to police chiefs whose departments have bought the recording devices, raising a host of conflict-of-interest questions.
A review of records and interviews by The Associated Press show Taser is covering airfare and hotel stays for police chiefs who speak at promotional conferences. It is also hiring recently retired chiefs as consultants, sometimes just months after their cities signed contracts with Taser.
Over the past 18 months, Taser has reached consulting agreements with two such chiefs weeks after they retired, and it is in talks with a third who also backed the purchase of its products, the AP has learned. Taser is planning to send two of them to speak at luxury hotels in Australia and the United Arab Emirates in March at events where they will address other law enforcement officers considering body cameras.
The relationships raise questions of whether chiefs are acting in the best interests of the taxpayers in their dealings with Scottsdale, Arizona-based Taser, whose contracts for cameras and storage systems for the video can run into the millions of dollars.


CITY COUNCIL DEMANDS INVESTIGATION INTO POLICE CHIEF WITH TASER TIES AFTER HE RECOMMENDED $1.9 MILLION IN PURCHASES


Citynewswatch also located this excellent and detailed reporting on TASER's ties to Ft. Worth, TX (now former) Police Chief Halstead after Halstead recommended millions of dollars in purchases from TASER:

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2015/03/03/ap-former-fort-worth-police-chief-has-financial-ties-to-body-cam-maker/  (quoted in it's entirety below for educational purposes)


IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) — Taser International, the stun-gun maker emerging as a leading supplier of body cameras for police, has cultivated financial ties to police chiefs whose departments have bought the recording devices, raising a host of conflict-of-interest questions.
A review of records and interviews by The Associated Press show Taser is covering airfare and hotel stays for police chiefs who speak at promotional conferences. It is also hiring recently retired chiefs as consultants, sometimes just months after their cities signed contracts with Taser.
Over the past 18 months, Taser has reached consulting agreements with two such chiefs weeks after they retired, and it is in talks with a third who also backed the purchase of its products, the AP has learned. Taser is planning to send two of them to speak at luxury hotels in Australia and the United Arab Emirates in March at events where they will address other law enforcement officers considering body cameras.
The relationships raise questions of whether chiefs are acting in the best interests of the taxpayers in their dealings with Scottsdale, Arizona-based Taser, whose contracts for cameras and storage systems for the video can run into the millions of dollars.
IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) —  Taser International, the stun-gun maker emerging as a leading supplier of body cameras for police, has cultivated financial ties to police chiefs whose departments have bought the recording devices, raising a host of conflict-of-interest questions.

>>WATCH: CBS 11 Investigative Reporter Mireya Villareal has been digging into this issue for weeks.  Click here to read her report<<

A review of records and interviews by The Associated Press show Taser is covering airfare and hotel stays for police chiefs who speak at promotional conferences. It is also hiring recently retired chiefs as consultants, sometimes just months after their cities signed contracts with Taser.

Over the past 18 months, Taser has reached consulting agreements with two such chiefs weeks after they retired, and it is in talks with a third who also backed the purchase of its products, the AP has learned. Taser is planning to send two of them to speak at luxury hotels in Australia and the United Arab Emirates in March at events where they will address other law enforcement officers considering body cameras.

The relationships raise questions of whether chiefs are acting in the best interests of the taxpayers in their dealings with Scottsdale, Arizona-based Taser, whose contracts for cameras and storage systems for the video can run into the millions of dollars.

As the police chief in Fort Worth, Texas, successfully pushed for the signing of a major contract with Taser before a company quarterly sales deadline, he wrote a Taser representative in an email, “Someone should give me a raise.”

The market for wearable cameras that can record arrests, shootings and other encounters has been growing fast since the killing last August of 18-year-old Michael Brown by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. President Barack Obama has proposed a $75 million program for departments to buy the cameras to reduce tensions between officers and the communities they serve.

City officials and rival companies are raising concerns about police chiefs’ ties to Taser, not only in Fort Worth but in such cities as Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Salt Lake City.

“Department heads need to be very careful to avoid that type of appearance of an endorsement in a for-profit setting,” said Charlie Luke, a Salt Lake City councilman. “It opens up the opportunity for competitors of these companies to essentially do what we’re seeing here — complaining about that public process.”

He said he was surprised when he learned last year that the city’s police department had purchased Taser cameras using surplus money, bypassing the standard bidding process and City Council approval. The department declined to say how much it has spent acquiring 295 body cameras and Taser’s Evidence.com video storage program and hasn’t responded to a month-old public records request.

The city’s police chief, Chris Burbank, said that his relationship with Taser, which includes company-paid travel to Taser-sponsored conferences, is appropriate. He recently recorded at the company’s request a promotional video in which he praised Evidence.com.

Burbank said he does not receive speaking fees and believes he hasn’t violated a city code prohibiting paid product endorsements on public time. He said he accepts Taser’s speaking invitations to promote the best ways of using body cameras. But Luke, the city councilman, questioned what value Salt Lake City gets from Burbank’s trips.

A Taser spokesman said the company has no control over how cities decide to award contracts. Taser says early adopters of technology are the best ones to discuss its benefits and drawbacks and share their experiences with colleagues.

“This is a pretty normal practice for police chiefs and other recently retired individuals to speak on behalf of the industry,” Taser chief marketing officer Luke Larson said.
Taser’s competitors say its cozy relationships are hurting their ability to seek contracts. They complain they have been shut out by cities awarding no-bid contracts to Taser and are being put at a disadvantage by requests for proposals that appear tailored to Taser’s products.
“Every time I do a presentation, as I’m standing there looking through the room, I wonder, ‘Who is tainted by Taser?'” said Peter Onruang, president of Wolfcom Enterprises, a California body camera maker.

Taser reported Thursday that orders for body cameras and Evidence.com soared to $24.6 million in the final three months of 2014 — a nearly fivefold increase from the same quarter in 2013. The company said it had contracts with 13 major cities and is in discussions or trials with 28 more.
A no-bid contract in Albuquerque and Taser’s relationship with the police chief prompted an investigation by the city’s inspector general.

City Council members demanded the inquiry after learning that Chief Ray Schultz, who had supported the $1.9 million contract for Taser cameras and storage, became a company consultant shortly after stepping down. A U.S. Justice Department investigation last year blasted Albuquerque’s rollout of the body cameras, saying it had been so hasty that officers had not been properly trained.

Today, Schultz speaks in an online promotional video about Albuquerque’s experience with Evidence.com. Although he has recently been hired as assistant chief in the Houston suburb of Memorial Villages, Schultz said he will be paid by Taser to speak at the international conferences in March.

Former New Orleans Police Superintendent Ronal Serpas confirmed he signed a Taser consulting agreement after he stepped down in August and has spoken at company-sponsored events in Canada and Arizona. Less than a year earlier, in December 2013, the city agreed to a $1.4 million contract with Taser for 420 cameras and storage.

In an interview with the AP, Serpas declined to detail how the consulting deal came about but said it did not violate a state ethics law because he is not lobbying his former employer. He also said he was not on the committee that recommended Taser for the contract.

Serpas said his role is to speak about how technology affects policing and not to promote products. Taser marketing materials reviewed by AP, however, quote him as calling the company’s Axon cameras and Evidence.com “a game changer for police departments here and around the world.”
In Fort Worth, emails obtained by the AP under Texas’ open records law show that then-Police Chief Jeffrey Halstead was seeking 400 more body cameras for officers last year and that Taser promised a discount if the deal could be approved before the end of the company’s sales quarter.

“Close of the month? I do not wear a cape or have x-ray vision you know,” Halstead wrote a Taser representative.

But over the next three weeks, Halstead successfully pushed the city to approve a no-bid contract worth up to $2.7 million. He kept Taser representatives aware of his progress, adding at one point that he deserved a raise.

In the following months, Taser had Halstead speak at events in Phoenix, Miami and Boston, covering his airfare and lodging, records show. The four-day Boston trip for Halstead and a companion cost Taser $2,445.

Halstead said he reached an oral agreement during the contract negotiations to travel to three other cities at Fort Worth’s expense to talk about his experience with Taser cameras. In one email, he told a Taser representative he believed he could persuade San Antonio to buy its cameras, “but my fee is not cheap! LOL.”

Halstead, who retired from the department in January, said he hopes to become an official consultant before he travels to speak at overseas events in March. He said he discussed such an arrangement during the end of his city employment, but had nothing promised.

He defended his ties to Taser as a “good business relationship” with a company that supports law enforcement.

Fort Worth City Manager David Cooke said he does not believe Halstead violated rules that prohibit employees from accepting job offers or other benefits that might influence the performance of their official duties. But he said the episode might reveal “gaps that we need to fill” in the code.

(© Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)    **for educational purposes, fully credited



BONUSES:

An interesting exchange about paying for body cameras from TASER INTERNATIONAL from the full TASER purchase discussion which can be found here: 
        Charlotte City Council Minutes Jan. 26, 2015:

Mr. Barnes said I think this might answer it; in an earlier slide, either the Chief or Mr. Harrington noted an intent by the Manager and by CMPD to make asset forfeiture contributions as possible and I think to Ms. Lyles question our historical experience has been that we get much more than $100,000 per year in asset forfeiture funds. For the sake of simplifying this exercise tonight and getting through this process I think if we leave it the way it is, if the Council is comfortable with it, I was trying to get us to actually draw down the capital contribution and increase the amount of money coming from another source, but if you want to leave it the way it is and take their word for it that they will contribute the asset forfeiture funds as allowed and as possible I’m fine with that as well. But I think the Chief was confident that he could contribute $100,000 per year for those three years throughout this process. 

Mr. Phipps said I was wondering would we apply that same thing if we happen to get grants that we would apply for; would we apply those as a reduction from the capital if we did that? 

Mr. Barnes said if I might Mr. Mayor, Mr. Phipps I think no grants are listed here as an opportunity so I don’t know if the Manager would be thinking that. I think we are operating strictly within what the staff laid out for us and the potential for contributions within those sources. 

Ms. Kinsey said I might be able to hold my nose and vote for this with $100,000 in there; I don’t know why we wouldn’t be able to leave it in there if you can look at $324,880 in the year 2019 and project that why not $100,000 each year? 

Mr. Carlee said would you repeat the question? 

Ms. Kinsey said I said I could probably hold my nose and support this with $100,000 from asset forfeiture in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018 and I did raise the question if we could project $324,880 in year 2019 why not $100,000 each year? 

Mr. Carlee said we don’t have a problem with that. 

Mayor Clodfelter said I think the Manager has endorsed the restructured motion. 

Ms. Lyles said I just want to say sometimes I’m really hesitant because my memory is not what it used to be, but I recall that asset forfeiture funds are governed strictly by a set of regulations that are federally imposed upon us to protect local communities from estimating revenues and causing police actions to go and purpose those revenues because it is projected in a future year. I don’t remember if that has changed or not but I’m just curious if that intent of estimating future revenues for asset forfeiture is really compliant with the intent or the regulations stated, and if it is not then I would agree, but my recall is that there was a great deal of caution about that so that communities wouldn’t go out and seize assets from citizens so that they could meet their project that year. That has been by concern and I don’t know if anyone can address that and if the rules have changed or the intent has changed, I’m very comfortable with the motion. If it hasn’t I would make a substitute motion to accept the recommendation as it is. 

Motion was made by Councilmember Barnes, seconded by Councilmember Howard, to (A) Approve a five year contract with Taser International in an amount not to exceed $5,491,186 for hardware, software license, services, storage, and ongoing maintenance for the implementation and support of Body Worn Cameras; (B) Authorize the City Manager to approve contracts for additional purchases in an amount not to exceed $1,551,058 for ancillary hardware, software, and services for the implementation and configuration of Body Worn Cameras; (C) Accept a donation form the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Foundation, in the amount of $250,000, to be used for the Body Worn Camera project, and (D) Adopt Budget Ordinance No. 5563-X appropriating $6,724,880 as follows: $5,900,000 from capital fund reserves, $574,880 from assets forfeiture funds and $250,000 from the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Foundation. The remaining balance of $317,364 will be funded within the future operating budgets with an amendment to include the $100,000 per year for FY16, FY17 and FY18 from asset forfeiture and reducing the capital contribution by a corresponding amount to take the capital down to $5.6 million and the asset forfeiture contribution would go up to $874,880 as available. January 26, 2015 Business Meeting Minute Book 137, Page 878 mpl 

Mayor Clodfelter said Chief you heard the question from Ms. Lyles; are we allowed to appropriate future asset forfeiture funds that we don’t yet know whether we are going to have or not? 

Chief Monroe said that is correct. 

Mayor Clodfelter said we are or we are not allowed to do that? 

Chief Monroe said we are not. 

Mayor Clodfelter said we are not allowed to do that, by Federal law? 

Chief Monroe said yes sir. 

Ms. Kinsey said then why can they put in $324,880? 

Mayor Clodfelter said Ms. Kinsey asked the quite appropriate question that in the out year of 2019 you have $324,880. 

Chief Monroe said that should be appropriated now. 

Mayor Clodfelter said from currently available funds? 

Chief Monroe said correct. 

Mayor Clodfelter said so Chief are you saying that the item before us really should have $574,880 of currently available asset forfeiture funds in the present fiscal year appropriated. 

Chief Monroe said in order to comply that needs to be loaded now or committed now. 

Mayor Clodfelter said Mr. Harrington, do we have that? 

Mr. Harrington said yes, and that is reflected in your budget ordinance under Section 4, the $574,880. 

Mayor Clodfelter said so that is exactly right so Councilmember Lyles needs to speak up so everybody understands what the point is and why everybody is getting confused by this chart. 

Ms. Lyles said the chart on Page 6 is a schedule of expense; you must appropriate the entire amount to encumber this. All you are seeing in this chart is when it is going to be scheduled. That is why I’m very reluctant to add money where it is not shown; what we are actually doing is appropriating $7,042,000 plus today; the chart shows when it will be expensed, but you have to by law encumber the amount of the contract and you must show that those revenues are there. It will show up in the asset forfeiture account of encumbrance of $574,000 which I am sure is in the account now. 
Mayor Clodfelter said otherwise you would not be requesting the action, correct? 

Ms. Kinsey said this is exactly why we should be doing this through the budgeting process or have more time to talk about it and to understand it. This is very confusing; I am not the dumbest person in the world and not the smartest either, but it is just very confusing and we are spending a lot of money in the overall scheme of things; $7 million is not like some we have spent but we really have not studied this as a Council and I hope we never do this again because it makes us look stupid and I don’t like looking stupid even if I am. I hope we don’t do this again because it is not pretty. 

Mr. Barnes said may I amend my motion? 

Mayor Clodfelter said I think it might be in order.



CLICK HERE for CMPD's new body-worn camera policy

Some Citynewswatch related articles











Monday, February 6, 2012

HERE’S A RE-CAP OF SOME CHARLOTTE POLICE ISSUES TO HELP THE NEW CITY COUNCIL (AND THE OLD ONE)

Most of the previous City Council recently admitted they were barely paying attention and had no idea they voted to give approval for City Manager Curt Walton to contract $50 Million of our money with zero oversight and zero disclosure (so far).

It seems like a good idea to remind the old council members and point out to new ones some very serious issues with lack of CMPD oversight.  It’s obvious the lack of accountability reaches far beyond this singular $50 Million issue of a police state that has been authorized, so let’s review a few:

INTRODUCTION OF A LONG LIST
Accurate Crime information, a fairly secret program (SHOP Shoplifting Offender Project) to keep crime statistics off the books, proper personnel decisions, contracting issues with vendors even outside the $50 Million in DNC 2012 contracts, truthfulness in statements from ‘leadership,’ millions in grant and budget money allocated for questionable spending while most police officers get no raises, equipment purchased from vendors with past relationships with the Chief of Police (with equipment that doesn’t work properly), documented recruiting standards changed while the police chief publicly says they have not been, missing police cars…  here is a look back to some of those items with a hope that Mayor Foxx and City Council will get answers and give them to the public, as they are chartered to do.

TRANSPARENCY & PUBLIC RECORDS IN GENERAL
Starting with the most urgent overall problem, the CMPD is operating in whatever level of secrecy Chief Monroe calls for instead of the appropriate level of public transparency.
Public Records Laws are being held in absolute contempt, and to date, no City Council Member or Mayor has shown the leadership to hold the City Manager accountable.

The City Council Code of Ethics spells out exactly the need for City leaders to hold the Manager and Police Chief responsible.  Part of section 5 states:

They should also remember that local government records belong to the public and not to them or City employees.
In order to ensure strict compliance with the laws concerning openness, the Mayor and Council members should make clear that an environment of transparency and candor is to be maintained at all times in the governmental unit. They should prohibit unjustified delay in fulfilling public records requests.

GENERAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING THE CODE OF ETHICS
The stability and proper operation of democratic reporesentative government depend upon public confidence in the integerity of the government and upon responsible exercise of the trust conferred by the people upon their elected officials.
A link to the full Code of Ethics is posted at right.

CRIME STATISTICS AT THE TOP OF THE LIST
There is a multi-part series about crime statistics contained on this site (Links to all segments are on the right side of the page or use SEARCH THIS SITE for Crime Statistics Part 1, Part 2...).  The first piece, “Crime Reporting Questions and Jealous Reporters?” has to do with Monroe’s really odd accusations that reporters might just be jealous of him as a motivation for asking for the real crime numbers.  Monroe had removed information from the public shortly after arriving as Chief of Police for Charlotte, then quickly claimed radical drops in crime at the same time refusing to release the raw data and denying he had made any changes in reporting methods.  The public has been trying to get that information back ever since.

It’s very hard to take Chief Monroe’s claims of dramatic crime reduction every year he’s been her seriously when he refuses to show the actual numbers and reports his claims are based on.

“Crime Reporting Questions and Jealous Reporters?” is also an extensive explanation of why it’s so important to get the classification of Type I and Type II crimes correct, not only for accuracy and because it’s the legal thing to do, but because grant money, staffing levels, and other critical decisions are based on the accurate reporting of the serious, Type I crimes for our city.

The CMPD Attorney’s Office gave information that Calls for Service for the year totaled 360,743, even though many other sources put the real number closer to a million.  They refuse to explain the discrepancy.

Chief Monroe told City Council there had been no changes in the way crime was being reported, but CMPD reports have footnotes stating that there have been changes as well as that CMPD numbers may not follow UCR reporting standards.

In addition to that, despite Monroe hiding the data, numerous examples of falsely reporting the type and severity of crime have been identified.

The most urgent daily issue may be the years of crime data that has been suppressed by Chief Monroe.  We need to know the information he has removed and has refused to supply through public records requests as well:

This post has a good explanation of all the information we need and why, but here is some of what has been removed over the last few years, and is mostly not available still:
1) Calls for service
2) Significant Event Log
3) Correct Uniform Crime Reporting Numbers, as they relate directly to the numbers above
4) Internal Affairs reports
5) Minutes of the Civil Service Board
6) Complete Police Department Budget

Read here where Chief Monroe’s Public Affairs Captain, Brain Cunningham, promised a citizen in 2010 that the CMPD web site was ‘under construction’ and the information would be back up soon.  The misinformation out of that office is frustrating, at best.

POOR CRIME REPORTING/PUBLIC CORRUPTION CHARGES COMPSTAT
This Part 5 post describes one reason “Why Every Citizen Should Care about Crime Reporting” and explains about a situation in New York, the birthplace of the CompStat computerized statistical reporting system which is also used here in Charlotte.  The pressure from the brass seemed to lead to underreporting of crime and in an illustrative case led directly to a serial rapist allowed to continue raping women because some earlier crimes were downgraded on reports.

It is also the story of hero cop Adrian Schoolcraft who tried to reform his department of the bad practices, but was instead attacked, dragged out of his home one Halloween by about a dozen uniformed and Brass in blue, labeled insane and locked away from all contact with the outside world for several days to intimidate him.  If he hadn’t had second tape recorder going of the terrifying events where he was essentially told he should have known better than to tell on his fellow cops, things might be very different for him now.  Other officers are stepping up to support him, but the charges of public corruption because public officials knew of the wrong practices and conspired to hide it are still under investigation.

"CompState, Investigations, Crime Statistics Part 6" continues the Schoolcraft story, but goes into more depth about the Comptstat system investigation into corruption in NY, and also how the numbers in Charlotte don’t seem to be correct.  There have been allegations of career damage here in Charlotte, too, whether anyone has been dragged off to a mental ward to intimidate them or not.
 
ISSUES WITH VENDOR CONTRACTS
Nearly unbelievably, on Feb. 9, 2009, Chief Monroe stood before City Council and explained how he thought the concept of ‘predictive analytics’ would be something to explore for use in police work.  A contract worth millions was awarded to Information Builders to produce a system for CMPD, which Monroe and his Deputy Chief Harold Medlock gave presentations to advertise—won awards for, as a matter of fact.  Those awards seem to be just more promotion for the company.  

The unbelievable part is that Monroe not only knew all about Information Builders at the time he spoke to council, but he had previously worked with them and advertised for them for years as Chief of Police in Richmond, VA.  There’s no word if direct compensation was involved, but with the odd subterfuge and multimillion-dollar contract involved, maybe someone should double check.

Even worse, the computer programs apparently don’t work for most officers on the streets because they take so long to boot up (nearly half an hour) that most officers reportedly don’t use the system in their cars.  It’s largely used by upper-level employees to prepare for those often-brutal Compstat meetings to try to get reported numbers down.

TASER CONTRACTS REALLY A MESS
This latest deal with TASER is really a difficult-to-describe mess.  Several posts on this site contain explanation of how Monroe met with TASER, Inc. officials to celebrate closing the sale of almost $2 Million of new TASERS before City Council voted to approve the sale.
Next came a ridiculous response from CMPD Attorney Judy Emken attempting to justify signing of contracts with no effective dates on them, contracts she said weren’t signed when they apparently had been, and contracts signed more than a month after TASER was advertising shipment of the sale to CMPD (without the required separate contract allowing advertising), followed up with Emken’s letter saying the person requesting must be “confused” by all the irregular contracts—along with letters that went unanswered to the Mayor and Council about the whole situation.

Then, the PERF consulting review that was supposed to be part of the decision-making matrix to buy the TASER X-2’s was obtained, and clearly states that the X-2 purchase decision was made prior to their involvement, contrary to what Monroe presented to Council and the public.

Rodney Monroe told council he did competitive searches and also looked for opportunities to lease.  We’d like to see the paperwork on that.

CHIEF RODNEY MONROE STATES HIS EXPERIENCE…
Having Rodney Monroe in charge of DNC 2012 security may be an issue when he stated in interviews he had more experience than he may have had.  See this link to watch the WSOC interview where he claimed he had been in charge of security for two presidential inaugurations and the Million Man March in Washington, DC.  However, since he made that first claim and citynewswatch announced that even based on his own prior statements, he only headed security for the 1992 Presidential Inauguration and the Million Man March, Monroe has ceased stating he headed the third event.  citynewswatch has not been able to confirm independent of Monroe’s prior statements that he headed the other two events, either.

Maybe this experience is in his background check, conducted by Waters Consulting Company, Inc., conducted before Monroe was hired by Curt Walton in 2008, confirmed by City Council and the Mayor.  Monroe also admitted publicly that he had been dishonest on his resume and stated he had received a degree in Criminal Justice, though the degree awarded to him was in in Interdisciplinary Studies.  He later said he was trying to convey that he had taken an emphasis in Criminal Justice, however it was discovered that he only took 6 credit hours out of his 120 at Virginia Commonwealth University. 

VCU later admitted they shouldn’t have awarded him a degree, but declined to take it back and mostly took responsibility for Chief Monroe not being able to read and understand the graduation requirements.  Most of Monroe’s credit hours were from an on-line college, paid with reimbursement from the municipality.  Public records requests for these reimbursements, said to exceed allowed amount, are in large part how the entire degree scandal that took out several top VCU officials was exposed.
 
Monroe announced four years ago when he came here that he would take coursework at a college here to earn his degree.   Strangely, about a year after that, Monroe told Richmond, VA magazine Style Weekly he had already completed 18 credit hours toward his Master’s degree.  However, he never mentioned that when numerous reporters here in Charlotte asked him if he had begun taking the rest of his undergraduate work yet.  There is no independent confirmation of these Masters classes he referred to.

WBTV recently aired an editorial on the topic, explaining they felt he shouldn’t have “an incomplete” and should to take the undergraduate classes that were a job requirement, after all.  The undergraduate degree is a minimum job requirement for many lower-level jobs in the police force as well. 

When someone set up for a private security company in Charlotte to get paid DNC security money for training to benefit that private company, citynewswatch did a story about it.  Metro Security had been on television to explain how they would be getting public money to get training that would benefit this private security company.  This seemed like the wrong strategy when money could have gone to our police officers who are continually told there is no money for raises.  The coverage included Metro Security’s Craigslist posting for new employees to pay them for this training, and then get paid $8.50/hour.  This seemed ill-conceived as top-level security by the nation’s best.

WHAT DID THE BACKGROUND CHECK SAY?
With so many issues that keep coming up about Monroe’s background and ongoing issues, it causes questions about what was in the background check commissioned by Charlotte before his hiring.  Were these issues disclosed in the background check done by the company hired to investigate Monroe before he came here?  Did City Manager Curt Walton know everything there was to know and approve the hiring anyway?  What about Council and the Mayor?  OR did the consulting company not do a thorough check? 

Even though some personnel matters are generally kept sealed, the City Manager is permitted to unseal a background check if it becomes a matter of public trust.

Charlotte has spent millions of dollars already on lawsuits Monroe has stated he should have done things differently on (ex: Marcus Jackson cases).  There was a great deal of money spent on the lawsuit regarding the First 48 Television Show.

With the records of over 500 officers records missing from Charlotte’s Police Academy now, it seems we deserve to take a good look at qualifications.

One only has to check the newspapers or do a little checking with the feds to see that there was a federal lawsuit filed over grant money Monroe was in charge of two jobs ago, as Police Chief in Macon, GA.

FEDERAL FUNDS FOR AT RISK YOUTH SUBJECT OF FEDERAL INVESTIGATION & SETTLEMENT AFTER CRIMINAL CHARGES
The Macon Telegraph has numerous articles on the subject of federal funds intended to go directly to help troubled and at-risk youth. However, much of the money was allegedly used for unapproved purchases and to pay salaries for people, despite that it was not a permitted use. Other money was just plain unaccounted for.

Eventually, the small city of Macon settled for $1,000,000. 

Charlotte has numerous programs with large funds intended to go directly to help troubled and at-risk youth.

Of course, Chief Monroe likes to mix up his charity work and sports.  Read this post and see, but he does not like to answer financial questions, no matter how much public money goes into organizations.  This needs to change immediately.  Open the books.  It’s the law.

MORE MISSING MONEY
Since August of last year, Council won’t disclose why they approved another $600,000 for what Monroe called a “command center ‘upfit’.”  This money was spent out of Asset Forfeiture so it was supposed to be approved ahead of spending, but seems they may have been approving money already spent last year.

Later, Councilman Barnes made a show at the CC meeting of saying he had some concerns, but they had been addressed. There was no public statement of what his concerns were or how they were addressed.  The public is still in the dark.

Similarly, when Deputy Chief Graue stated to City Council that the Department had no idea what happened to 50 brand new police cars—about $2,000,000 minimum value.  Based on their refusal to say who is driving certain cars, and reports that some part-time employees and others that shouldn’t have the cars have been driving them home, they probably know where they are, but would rather not tell us.  It’s the least disturbing of all options. 

Were they sold for cash for someone’s personal benefit?  Are terrorists driving around in police cars?  Is Rodney Monroe so incompetent that even three months later he still can’t have his staff find 50 brand new police cars? 

This is inventory, folks.  Expensive inventory.  And we have a right to demand to know where those cars are.  We paid for them.  There’s another $2,000,000 or more that could have gone toward police raises.

PERSONNEL PROBLEMS
The Human Resources Department that should process employee complaints just stated they refused to get involved.  They are certainly aware of discrimination, retaliation, and other complaints within the police department.  How is it acceptable for HR to say “we won’t take any action?”

City Manager Curt Walton seemed to orchestrate an intentionally delayed response with Chief Monroe and his Public Affairs Office when asked about raises, promotions, fairness of testing and promotions, positions that were not in CMPD Directives, and other issues.  Curt Walton refused to answer until a few MINUTES after Monroe announced the promotions, and even then tried to refer to Directives which didn’t exist.

Since then, Sergeant Tammy Hatley has won her lawsuit where a judge found the CMPD clearly violated her right to due process in related issues.  Others that were waiting to see how her lawsuit turned out are said to be in negotiations for related settlements and/or considering their own suits.
 
Then there’s the ongoing EEOC Federal investigation.

All of this Federal scrutiny is a good thing since City of Charlotte officials seem either completely unwilling or incapable of cleaning up their own behavior.  This is the best time for officers who have been too afraid of losing their pensions and jobs to speak up.

CMPD Attorney Mark Newbold has given an unrelated prior talk about how important is not to retaliate against employees once they have filed a complaint on the job.  Those guidelines should be in place before complaints are filed and should be stressed especially right now at CMPD.  Careful adherence to this policy should be stressed since so many officers are afraid to talk in the current atmosphere of widespread retaliation.
  
STILL WAITING TO GET BLUE HORNETS FINANCE INFORMATION
For half a year, using the full force of the CMPD Attorneys, his Public Affairs team, the City Attorneys, and the City Council to back him up (inexplicably) Rodney Monroe has absolutely refused to reveal the funding sources and outlets for the CMPD Blue Hornets Baseball Team. 

The non-profit company set up to receive and distribute money for the team is the “Great Balls of Fire Foundation, Inc,” in the name of Deputy Chief David Graham.  Board Member and designated contact for the group is Major Paul ZInkann.  The group receives public money and is therefore subject to release of this information. 

First, Public Affairs Captain (and the web site) Brian Cunningham claimed the players took care of all their own expenses. Asset Forfeiture funds labeled “team charlo” exceed $60,000 and CMPD refuses to answer whether those or another $5,000 in “monogramming” AF funds were used for the Team, though is seems likely and would very likely not be allowed per federal law. (Asset Forfeiture spending is a topic unto itself).

Also, covert donations from sponsors to police organizations should not be allowed—this is a safety consideration and also involves potential influence on lucrative security contracts.

Deputy Chief David Graham receiving the benefits of a tax shelter for what appears to be hundreds of thousands of write-offs related to public money going through the police department may be a conflict that should be resolved as well, particularly when the participants are not disclosed.

FIRST 48 TELEVISION SHOW
Major Zinkann was also intricately involved for Chief Monroe in the making of the First 48 television production about police officers in Charlotte.  At that time,  Chief Monroe signed away the perpetual rights of all police officers, on- and off-duty, as well as encumbering the City of Charlotte in numerous ways, by signing a contract for a television show about police work which had already proven to be risky to possibly deadly in other cities before he did so.

Even though legal responsibilities of the City of Charlotte City Council include signing contracts on behalf of the City, there was not any other city signature other than Monroe, who at the time had his close assistant (now Deputy Chief) Vicki Foster working with him on the show as well.  She and her live-in security guard company partner Melvin Keys were pitching a “security guard reality show” to production companies at the same time, regardless of CMPD regulations on secondary employment.

CMPD Attorney Mark Newbold, in accordance with the City Manager and City Attorney, intentionally withheld Chief Monroe’s correspondence from a public records request about this entire matter, with the exception of one email of no consequence (and the contract he signed).  There is separate documentation showing that Newbold instructed others not to ask Monroe for his correspondence to respond to public records requests.  If Newbold ever asked Monroe for it himself, it was not ultimately provided.  You can read in the post what seems to be a strategy of keeping Monroe out of documented trouble as much as possible.

OFFICER SECURITY AND THE ACADEMY
Chief Monroe has denied since Cedarposts.blogspot.com broke the story back in mid-September that CMPD Officers’ personnel records are missing from the Police Academy and possibly other locations.  After asking the Department of Justice to intervene, they released a partial memo that was a clear admission the records of numerous officers were missing, but wouldn’t say how many or answer questions about the implications of the missing records for officers’ certifications, cases, security, or other important issues.

citynewswatch has now learned that over 500 Officers’ records are known missing, though the last known time they were secure has not been established yet. 

How does the Chief of Police that will be heading security for DNC manage to have records for 500 Officers disappear under his nose from his Police Academy?  Were they intentionally removed?   Is it true that the Academy has now lost certification and the next recruit classes are canceled?

More than one blog—here and at Cedarposts.blogspot.com—lent a written voice for officers about the security risk and wasted expense of the mandatory CMPD “Yearbook” photos Monroe tried to instate.  Raising this concern publicly seemed to cause the change in policy to make it non-mandatory, but it shouldn’t have taken place at all.
 
In addition to the waste of money and security risk, it seems even officers who paid to get a yearbook haven’t received them half a year later.  What happened to the money?  What photographer and printing company were involved and was there competition, or was this another “recommendation from on high?”  We’d like to see the paperwork on this one, too.

“CUSTOMER SATISFACTION”
Depending on what part of Charlotte you live in, your experience with crime and with the police will probably be quite different.  See what happened when a wealthy campaign donor had an irritating problem with pranksters stealing $7.50 plastic campaign signs from the grassy area out front of her house.  She placed a call to Patrick Cannon, who called his good buddy Rodney Monroe, and then Captain Martha Dozier set up her division with a multi-day undercover sting, cameras in unmarked cars behind bushes.  Estimated cost to the tax payers:  minimum $15,000. 

By contrast, a group of active neighbors on the West side Camp Greene neighborhood looking for a little information and support to keep a 75 bed parole house for violent convicted felons from moving in next to their churches and schools could not get a single response from Police, the Mayor, or any sitting Council Member.

Conducting the Citizen Survey this past year, Monroe used tax money to ask people if they had seen a police car in their neighborhood in the past year.  Guess what:  76% of respondents had seen one.  Brilliant use of our money.
 
Out of about 1 million calls to 911 per year, only 27 respondents were rated on their satisfaction with the police on how they were treated.

45% of the people were from the wealthiest, lowest-crime area in Charlotte: the Southeast Division.  And, 72% live in a single-family detached home, with another 11% in a condo or townhome.  It shouldn’t be a big surprise that most of those people felt pretty safe.  In past years, respondents were evenly split among Divisions, but maybe Monroe knew that wouldn’t produce good results.  Even these results were questionable.

·       Fear of Break-ins and Burglary JUMPED from 25% in 2008 to 38% in 2011
·       Fear of Assault, Rape, & Robbery SKYROCKETED from 12% in 2008 to 37% in 2011
·       Fear of Murder has gone up, too

Charlotte is certainly not as rough as the area of D.C. where Chief Monroe had cut his teeth as commander in a very rough area.  Here’s an example of his leadership there:
The information we’re entitled to here in Charlotte, and with the Public Records Laws we have now, is quite different than what is portrayed in this Washington, D.C. story.  Internal Affairs and peer reporting should be quite different than the scenario in this reporter’s story.  What are we really getting in our Police Leadership?  Is it different now?

We deserve the answers.  So do our officers who haven’t had a real raise in three years, while millions of dollars are funneled into Monroe’s special projects, special hires, and special cars—not to mention the lawsuits his leadership has encountered.

With City Council going on luxury vacations at $513/night, Mayor Foxx hiring yet another assistant at maybe $72,000/year, $2,000,000 in new TASERS most officers say are bulky and were unnecessary to begin with, $5,000,000 for new cars when the Chief says he can’t find $2,000,000 in other brand new cars we already have, and the list goes on…

It’s frustrating to put your life on the line to be a Police Officer with no raises for years, unfair hiring and promotion practices (proven in court lack of due process), allegations of EEOC violations, allegations of retaliatory job transfers and demotions, Internal Affairs investigations opened on the Chief of Police with no known completion, covering up crimes allegedly committed by police officers until they are discovered by the public, seemingly voiding arrests of police officers allegations of brass level employees being permitted to drag employees in and abuse them for false beliefs they have supplied (truthful) information about them to another person, retaliatory disciplinary action, and refusing to have financial accountability for any actions taken.

Dear City Council,
Please account for all this missing money.
Please take any diverted or wasted funds and set them aside exclusively for raises for our officers that have not had a raise in years, despite the City Manager voting himself large bonuses and raises and Chief Monroe giving raises to his brass level employees, often under questionable circumstances.
Please release all crime information.
Please release all financial information for any “charitable” organizations related to the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department.
Please investigate the personnel issues in the CMPD.
Please create a safe ombudsman for police and civilians alike to contact to report issues related to the police department that need investigation, including an anonymous mechanism if necessary.
Please investigate the connections between contracts awarded for police work and those in the police department.

Thank you.