Post News . Share Ideas . Inspire Innovation . Get Informed . Get Involved



Showing posts with label Charlotte. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charlotte. Show all posts

Thursday, November 23, 2017

Alleged Hit & Run DUI Driver that Killed Likely 'Bonded Out' with about $1000


 TIMOTHY CRAIG MEDLEY





ARRESTED AND PRESUMED INNOCENT FOR HITTING AND KILLING A MAN WHILE IMPAIRED, THEN FLEEING THE SCENE.  

A Mecklenburg County Magistrate assigned bond of only $2500 UNsecured (meaning a signature promise he would pay that much if he doesn't show up for court to face charges) and $5000 each secured bond for felony charges of death by vehicle and hit & run causing death.  That secured bond of $5000 usually means payment of only 10-15% of the amount, or about $500 each, to secure release from jail after being found with his car smashed in and apparently impaired and on a street near the man who was killed.  

Just what kind of bond references are Magistrates using?  Are there any guidelines?

If you're wondering, he 'bonded out' three hours after his arrest.  The sun wasn't even up yet.  One wonders if three hours was long enough for a person to sober up, if in fact they are impaired.  

Citynewswatch sends a special thank you to the gentleman who was paying attention to the world and people around him, noticed the person walking at the side of the road as he left for the store, noticed a banged up car on a side street on his way home, and searched for the walker.  While it's sad that he found the shoe and located the crime victim, it would be more sad if that person had been left alone in the cold night and a nobody went to help him, report the crime, or tell his family and friends what happened.  Peace to him and those that helped.

Mecklenburg Co. Sheriff:
Ref: Charge/Court: ORD/Bond Type/County Case/CSL Disp
001 540500 / 1150A REL / 2500 UNS / 17CR244016 B
Date: 11/24/2017 09:00 AM Description: DRIVING WHILE IMPAIRED
002 540600 / 1150A REL / 5000 SEC / 17CR244017 B
Date: 11/24/2017 09:00 AM Description: DEATH BY VEHICLE - FELONY
003 470800 / 1150A REL / 5000 SEC / 17CR244018 B
Date: 11/24/2017 09:00 AM Description: FEL HIT/RUN SER INJ/DEATH
SENTENCES

Arrest #:
01738474 PID:
0000188763 JID:
17-095501 DOB:
11/24/1972
Race/Sex:
CAU/M
Height:
508"
Address:
CHARLOTTE NC 28278
Alias:
Status:
STATE INMATE
Housing:
Not Active
By:
Commited:
11/23/2017 2:37 AM
Released:
11/23/2017 5:42 AM

see this entire story BY JOE MARUSAK from The Charlotte Observer here: 

Driver saw shoe on dark Charlotte road. What he did next led to an arrest.
BY JOE MARUSAK
jmarusak@charlotteobserver.com
NOVEMBER 23, 2017 04:14 PM

A driver saw a shoe on a dark Charlotte road late Wednesday. What he did next made all the difference in helping police find a hit-and-run suspect.

The driver on Shopton Road West in southwest Charlotte had earlier been heading to a store when he saw a man walking on the side of the road, according to police.

The driver, whom police have not identified, spotted the shoe when he was returning from the store. On nearby Pilcher Drive, he also saw a parked 2006 Kia Sorento with lots of damage, police said.

He realized the man he’d seen earlier might have been hit by the car, so he immediately returned to the scene and found the victim lying in grass off the right side of the road.

Then the driver called 911.

The pedestrian, 49-year-old Michael James Denny, was pronounced dead at the scene, according to police.

Thanks to the driver who found Denny and called 911, police arrested 44-year-old Timothy Craig Medley of Charlotte and charged him with driving while impaired, felony death by vehicle and felony hit and run. Medley is free on $12,500 bail.

Police said Medley was driving north on Shopton Road West from South Tryon Street when Denny was hit while walking in the 16200 block. That stretch of Shopton Road West is not lit with overhead street lights and has no sidewalks on either side, according to police.

Police said they arrested Medley after they interviewed him and found him to be impaired.

“The witness in this case was instrumental to the quick apprehension of the suspect,” police said in a statement early Thursday. “Without his willingness to become involved, it is doubtful that the victim would have been located tonight and the suspect may have escaped justice.”

From MeckSheriff.com :
https://mecksheriffweb.mecklenburgcountync.gov   Inmate search

CHARGES

Ref: Charge/Court: ORD/Bond Type/County Case/CSL Disp
001 540500 / 1150A REL / 2500 UNS / 17CR244016 B
Date: 11/24/2017 09:00 AM Description: DRIVING WHILE IMPAIRED
002 540600 / 1150A REL / 5000 SEC / 17CR244017 B
Date: 11/24/2017 09:00 AM Description: DEATH BY VEHICLE - FELONY
003 470800 / 1150A REL / 5000 SEC / 17CR244018 B
Date: 11/24/2017 09:00 AM Description: FEL HIT/RUN SER INJ/DEATH
SENTENCES

Ref: Case: CSL CNS Begin YY Min MM DD YY MAX MM DD TP Earn Cred END
001 17CR244016
002 17CR244017
003 17CR244018

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

Update on I-77 Toll Votes & COURT CASE DELAY

For anyone who had planned to attend court on Friday, 
Widen I-77 has announced it is seeking to delay the suit it has filed.

Last night, the Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners voted to send their representative to CRPTO with a NO vote on proceeding with the Cintra/I-77 Mobility Partners toll project heading north of Charlotte.  Widen-I-77 now hopes to sway Charlotte's City Council to vote in kind.  They wish to have the City of Charlotte cast their considerable 38 votes in addition to Mecklenburg County's 2 votes in opposition to the current toll lanes project. 

WCCB Charlotte reports this way:

CHARLOTTE, NC — Opponents to the I-77 toll lanes are trying to delay a lawsuit they filed to allow the political process to play out.

A hearing was set in that lawsuit for this Friday. But Wednesday, Widen I-77 announced it’s asking to stay that suit.

The group hopes to influence the Charlotte City Council, which has a 46 percent vote on the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization, which is the group that ultimately decides if the project lives or dies.

“All Charlotte has to do is have one or two municipalities vote with it, and the motion will carry,” said Kurt Naas of Widen I-77.

Tuesday night, Mecklenburg County Commissioners voted 8-1 against the toll lanes.




You should STILL make your opinion known via email addresses always provided to the right sidebar here and phone numbers below:

Office of the City Clerk
704-336-2248

Mayor Jennifer Roberts
600 East 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-2241

Mayor Pro Tem Vi Lyles
Council member at large
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3431

​Julie Eiselt
Council member at large
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: to come

Claire Green Fallon
Council member at large
PO Box 481325
Charlotte, NC, 28269
Telephone: 704-336-6105

James Mitchell
Council member at large
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3430

​Patsy B. Kinsey
Council member, district 1
2334 Greenway Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28204
Telephone: 704-336-3432

Al Austin
Council member, district 2
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3185

LaWana Mayfield
Council member, district 3
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3435

Gregory A. Phipps
Council member, district 4
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3436

​John N. Autry
Council member, district 5
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-2777

Kenny Smith
Council member, district 6
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone:  704-574-7241

Edmund H. Driggs
Council member, district 7
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-432-7077



Tuesday, January 5, 2016

ARE YOU THIS STUPID OR THIS CORRUPT?

 Is this the first question that comes to mind every time you read of anyone’s support for I-77 Toll Lanes?  It is for the staff at Citynewswatch. 

Each update is more and more infuriating, including the information from last night’s work session of the Charlotte City Council committee where they took a vote of 3-2 to support toll lanes, with Vi Lyles supporting. 

Lyles is the sole vote representing Charlotte on CRPTO (the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization) with a weighted vote of 31 out of 68 which essentially makes it the only one that counts. She has made it clear she intends to keep supporting the contract with Spanish-based I-77 Mobility Partners/Cintra to build toll lanes which may cost around $20 per round trip at rush hour.  The private toll lanes would skip over certain exit areas altogether and dump traffic into select real estate development areas.  Toll lanes would only be strong enough to support cars (read ==> trucks will be forced to stay on "free" lanes and increase slowdowns and air pollution for the poor masses).

What is the reason for support of this crazy contract?

The State of North Carolina contracted with a company known to default and go bankrupt multiple times in other states.  They have been involved in government bribes.  They were awarded a no-competitive-bid contract with a 50-year non-compete clause so that NC may not add any tax-funded lanes (or should we say other tax-funded lanes?) without paying huge penalties. 

Here’s another problem:  the threats of huge penalties to scare us into submission are fluctuating from a relatively small amount to $300 million. The NCDOT representative also says the number can’t be calculated.

Can’t be calculated?  From a contract you wrote?

Again… 
‘Are you that stupid or that corrupt’ comes to mind.


Of course the representative is Ned Curran, who is also CEO of Charlotte-based Bissell Companies real estate developer.  That’s right:  The chairman of the state Board of Transportation directing where & how our tax money is spent on roads is head of one of the biggest real estate developers in the area. 

Curran has been quoted with statements that voting down this project would affect lanes being built on Independence Blvd. and on Charlotte's outer loop along with other local projects, and further that any “regular” lanes being built on I-77 would be delayed a minimum of 6 months more for an air quality study to be conducted.  Opponents say the first statement is simply untrue and is nothing more than retaliation.  No explanation has been given for the air quality study.  But even if it’s true, wouldn’t a 6-month delay seem inconsequential compared to hundreds of millions or perhaps billions of dollars lost to a foreign country with a spotty record of accomplishment?  Is there any confidence that air quality would be better with Cintra managing toll lanes than with additional “free” lanes?  Probably not—and that should be the comparison for air quality decisions. 


EASY BACKGROUND

If you need to catch up on this important issue, here’s a video posted on You Tube has been posted some time ago but with good information and a snappy tune:




TONIGHT’S CITY COUNCIL MEETING STUPIDITY

The Charlotte Observer’s Steve Harrison recapped the Council committee meeting including.

Here are a couple of the dumbest highlights:

  • ·       “Lyles, the committee chairman, tried to steer the conversation away from questions about the 1-77 project specifically.”  Um, what did Lyles think people were there to discuss?  A corrupt, outrageous contract for a toll road that should not be built--which will benefit NOBODY except developers with some very specific tracts of land and a company that is building those toll roads.

  • ·       "Upon initial review the (auditor’s) report appears to reaffirm that, while the exact cost of cancellation cannot be calculated, it will clearly be substantial," the DOT said.  It has been stated at about $100 Million or up to $300 Million.  Would you make a contract that may be off by 300% or off by $200 Million?   That’s what Vi Lyles and possibly Jennifer Roberts and others want you to pay for.   And probably your children.  And their children.  50 Years.

  • ·       “Julie Eiselt, a Democrat, said she asked a friend who works in construction in Spain about Cintra, which has been criticized by toll lane opponents. Eiselt said her friend told her the firm has a good reputation.”  Let’s base our decision about Cintra’s reputation on government bribery and bankruptcies and defaults for other toll road projects in major cities that have left those cities bleeding out ransoms of tax-payer funds.  I don’t care what Eiselt’s friend heard at the water cooler en Espana. Embarrassing.




 NEXT

A group called WIDEN I-77 has filed suit to stop the toll roads.  The hearing will be this 
Friday, Jan. 8, at 10:00 a.m. 
in at the Mecklenburg County Courthouse at 832 East 4th Street in Charlotte in Court Room 6170 and is open to public attendance. 


You should also make your opinion known via email addresses always provided to the right sidebar here and phone numbers below:

Office of the City Clerk
704-336-2248

Mayor Jennifer Roberts
600 East 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-2241

Mayor Pro Tem Vi Lyles
Council member at large
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3431

​Julie Eiselt
Council member at large
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: to come

Claire Green Fallon
Council member at large
PO Box 481325
Charlotte, NC, 28269
Telephone: 704-336-6105

James Mitchell
Council member at large
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3430

​Patsy B. Kinsey
Council member, district 1
2334 Greenway Avenue
Charlotte, NC 28204
Telephone: 704-336-3432

Al Austin
Council member, district 2
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3185

LaWana Mayfield
Council member, district 3
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3435

Gregory A. Phipps
Council member, district 4
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-3436

​John N. Autry
Council member, district 5
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-336-2777

Kenny Smith
Council member, district 6
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone:  704-574-7241

Edmund H. Driggs
Council member, district 7
600 E. 4th Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2244
Telephone: 704-432-7077



Friday, July 25, 2014

24 Hours of Booty Bicycle Fundraiser starts TONIGHT




Please excuse the lateness of this announcement, but check to see how you can participate in this excellent cancer-fighting charity in Charlotte's 24 Hours of Booty bicycle fundraiser starting at 7 p.m. this evening and continuing for 24 non-stop hours.  As they say, "Ride, Cheer, Volunteer!"


Quoted from www.24hoursofbooty.org :


Join us for the Charlotte event: 
July 25-26, 2014 7 p.m. - 7 p.m. 
Charlotte's Myers Park neighborhood is home to the original Booty Loop. In partnership with presenting sponsor, Levine Cancer Institute, 24 Hours of Booty Charlotte will celebrate its thirteenth year and host 1,200 riders who will raise more than $1.2 million for cancer research and survivorship. 
The Booty Loop is in the beautiful Myers Park neighborhood. At the center of it all is Bootyville, our own little city, which also serves as the event headquarters over the 24 hours at Myers Park Traditional School.  


CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION 
and ways to donate/volunteer/ride

Awesome effort by everyone involved for a great cause!
Good Luck!



Also check out this article in the Charlotte Observer with personal stories of how our neighbors have been affected by cancer and by this wonderful event.


Friday, May 16, 2014

Have a Clean House, Help Charities

Clean out your house, and take the quality, usable pieces you don't need anymore to local Goodwill and Habitat Restores listed below.  Bring your clean, gently used furniture, computers, clothing, dishes, and other items to donate this Saturday.  You will feel good in your clean home and help others.

Event details at www.metrolinarestores.org
Super Spring Sweep will take donations from 9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. at a number of local donation sites:

• Habitat for Humanity of Gaston County ReStore, 1840 E. Franklin Blvd., Gastonia.
• Habitat for Humanity of York County ReStore, 825 N. Anderson Road, Rock Hill, S.C.
• Charlotte Habitat for Humanity ReStore, 1133 N. Wendover Road, Charlotte.
• Our Towns Habitat for Humanity Restore, 20414 N. Main St., Cornelius.
• Our Towns Habitat for Humanity Restore, 121 Norman Station Blvd., Mooresville.
• Habitat for Humanity of Cabarrus County ReStore, 2902 S. Cannon Blvd. Kannapolis.
• Habitat for Humanity of Iredell County ReStore, 1382 Shelton Ave., Statesville.
• Habitat for Humanity of Catawba County ReStore, 772 Fourth St. SW, Hickory.
• Habitat for Humanity of Lincoln County ReStore, 809 E. Sycamore St. Lincolnton.

 See a longer article with details also at CharolotteObserver.com

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/05/14/4910109/super-spring-sweep-donation-drive.html#storylink=cpy

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

After Mayor Patrick Cannon Arrested, Charlotte City Council Defers Choice

Charlotte City Council met tonight and voted to pass a motion postponing choice of a new Mayor of Charlotte until next Monday, April 7th.  Several members expressed that they wanted a little more time to hear from constituents, even though voters will not be given a direct voice.  Behind the scenes, it doesn't seem there is consensus supporting one candidate.

Some citizens have come forward asking for a new election in November, but that would require legislative intervention from State representatives, and many local elected officials balked at the notion of requesting assistance from Raleigh.  

Mayor Patrick Cannon has been arrested and charged last week on federal corruption charges, including violations of the Hobbs Extortion Act, using his office, Theft or Bribery, and Wire Fraud.  




The Complaint clearly states that the FBI undercover investigation began with another City of Charlotte employee, which then led to Cannon.  Cannon is quoted (in the Complaint) referencing a City employee that would be very helpful to the undercover agents:

(The) “city manager’s made (him/her) part of his executive team. (He/she) could be a city manager but (he/she) doesn’t want to. (He/she) wants to continue to do planning and all that kind of stuff.” 

The Complaint states after Cannon was given free use of a $2,100 per month apartment with special entry/exit, Cannon gave the name of a City Department Head to the undercover agent, explaining how helpful that person would be to the fake investors used in the FBI sting operation.

From Charmeck.org, the Manager's staff is listed:


City leadership bios
City Manager Ron Carlee
Deputy City Manager Ron Kimble
Assistant City Manager Eric Campbell
Assistant City Manager Hyong Yi
Executive Team Member Debra Campbell
Chief of Staff Carol L. Jennings

Sentences if Cannon is convicted on charges:
Maximum 10 years in prison & $250,000 fine for THEFT and BRIBERY
Maximum 20 years in prison & $1,000,000 fine for FRAUD
Maximum 20 years in prison & $250,000 fine for EXTORTION


If convicted, there should be a hefty sentence to demonstrate that "leaders" are not above the law.  Cannon's wife is implicated in the affidavit, but she has not been arrested.  Pity and sadness should be for the Cannons' children.   

More arrests for corruption in Charlotte may be on the way.  Probably a number of locals are very nervous.  Remember that the $48,000 and other gifts allegedly accepted by Cannon are only the items documented in the undercover sting after other allegations surfaced.  There may be more.  And there may be other people who are finally caught.  Now that the FBI has finally gotten an investigation underway, why not clean house?  


Wednesday, January 22, 2014

CRB Reform Passed by City Council

Charlotte's City Council passed some of the proposed changes to the Citizens Review Board code by a vote November 25, 2013.  It contains significant changes, though not all the recommendations of either the Charlotte School of Law or of citizens seeking reform, including a coalition of groups called CRB REFORM NOW.

The changes require the police department to deliver the entire Internal Affairs file of the contested charges to the CRB.  Before, only a summary of information chosen by the police department was released to the Board.

The changes allow the CRB to ask for additional evidence.

The big request for subpoena power has not been met.



See the changes here (deletions from original shown in strikeout text, additions are underlined):


ORDINANCE NUMBER: 5259 AMENDING CHAPTER 16

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE CHARLOTTE CITY CODE 
ENTITLED “POLICE” 

BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, that:

Section 1. Article II, Division 2 of Chapter 16 of the Charlotte City Code is amended as
follows:
DIVISION 2. - CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD
Sec. 16-56. - Creation; composition; terms; compensation; appointments; vacancies; quorum; removal.
Sec. 16-57. - Meetings.
Sec. 16-58. - Duties and responsibilities.
Sec. 16-59. - Appeal procedureRequest for appeal hearing.
Sec. 16-60. - Necessity for hearingHearing.
Sec. 16-61. - Hearing proceduresReserved.
Sec. 16-62. - Action by chief of police and city manager.
Sec. 16-63. - City clerk's duties; meeting places; staff.
Sec. 16-64. - ReportsMiscellaneous.

Sec. 16-56. - Creation; composition; terms; compensation; appointments; vacancies; 
quorum; removal. 
(a) There is hereby established a citizens review board to be composed of 11 members: five members
to be appointed by the city council, three members to be appointed by the mayor and three to be
appointed by the city manager. The appointing authorities shall ensure that the members of the
board are representative of the community.
(b) Members must be continually domiciled within the county and must be registered to vote within the
county.
(c) Board members shall attend and successfully complete the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police
Department's Citizens' Academy and receive training on relevant legal and, policy and cultural 
awareness issues as required by the city manager. This training must be completed prior to any
board appointee serving as a member of the board.
(d) Individuals with a felony conviction or a class A1 misdemeanor conviction shall not be eligible to
serve on the board. In addition, individuals with a class 1 or class 2 misdemeanor conviction within
three years of their nomination for appointment shall be ineligible to serve. Further, conviction of or a plea of nolo contendere to a felony, a class A1 misdemeanor, a class 1 misdemeanor, or a class 2
misdemeanor during the term of office shall automatically terminate membership on the board,
irrespective of any appeals. Board members charged with a felony, a class A1 misdemeanor, a class
1 misdemeanor, or a class 2 misdemeanor during a term of office shall be automatically suspended
until disposition of the charge, and a quorum shall be established from the remaining membership.
(e) Prior to serving, each board member must sign a confidentiality agreement that is satisfactory to the city and which shall require that members maintain as confidential any information classified as
confidential by state law or otherwise classified as confidential by the city.
(f) The members shall serve staggered terms of office for three years, with no member serving more
than two consecutive terms.
(g) The board shall elect a chairperson and vice-chairperson from the membership.
(h) When a vacancy occurs, the original appointing authority shall appoint a person to serve for the
unexpired term of the vacant position.
(i) Six members shall constitute a quorum in order to hold business meetings and hearings. Members
are required to attend all business meetings and hearings in accordance with the attendance policies
promulgated by the city council. Vacancies resulting from a member's failure to attend the required
number of meetings shall be filled as provided in this section.
(j) All members shall serve without compensation.
(k) Members of the board shall be subject to removal from office by a two-thirds vote of the city council.

Sec. 16-57. - Meetings. 
(a) The citizens review board shall hold regular meetings as scheduled by resolution of the board. The
affirmative vote of a majority, a quorum being present, shall be required before any recommendation
is made on any matter considered. A majority vote shall be required for any decision made by the
board.
(b) Special meetings may be called by the chairperson to carry out any duties described in section 16-58 by giving each member notice in writing, by providing personal notice, or by leaving notice at the
member's residence not less than 72 hours prior to the time set for the meeting.
Sec. 16-58. - Duties and responsibilities.
(a) The citizens review board shall:
(1) Serve as an advisory board to the chief of police, the city manager, and the city council.
(2) ReviewHear appeals by the citizens who filed complaints of disciplinary dispositions imposed by
the chief of police or his designee relating to allegations of misconduct against a sworn police
officer. The board may hear appeals of complaints regarding alleged violations of the following
rules: use of force, unbecoming conduct, and arrest, search and seizure. In addition, the
disposition of the review of any discharge of a firearm by an officer which results in the death or
injury of a person may be appealed to this board by the person injured or the next of kin if death
occurs. When a death results and there is no next of kin, any member of the city council or the
chairperson of the community relations committee may file an appeal pursuant to section 16-59.
The disciplinary actions that may be reviewed shall include the findings of the chief of police that
an allegation has been categorized as: sustained, not sustained, exonerated, or unfounded. The
dispositions that may be reviewed for the discharge of firearms shall include: justified, not
justified, or accidental. The board may review only appeals of citizen complaints arising from
incidents that occur after the effective date of the ordinance from which this section derives. The
board may not review appeals of decisions of the city manager or the civil service board. No 
hearing conducted under this division is intended to supplant civil or criminal remedies or 
proceedings, nor civil service proceedings under section 4.61 of the city charter. 
(3) Determine whether to hold an appeal hearing. The board may hold an appeal hearing only 
when it appears, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the disposition of the 
disciplinary charges entered by the chief of police constituted an abuse of, in its discretion by 
the chief of police.
(4) Conduct appeal hearings, which include receiving and evaluating testimony and issuing findings 
of fact and, also may make recommendations to the chief of police and the city manager. The 
duty and power of the board is to conduct an appeal hearing and to determine whether, by a 
preponderance of the evidence, the chief of police abused his discretion by: 
a. Finding in a disciplinary action that allegations were sustained, not sustained, exonerated 
concerning policies, procedures or unfounded; ortraining of police officers.
b. Finding in connection with the discharge of a firearm that the officer's action was justified, 
not justified, or accidental. 
(5(4) As required by state law, maintain as confidential all personnel information to which the
members gain access as a member of the board. In addition, board members shall be required
to execute and adhere to a confidentiality agreement that is satisfactory to the city.
(b) The citizens review board shall promulgate rules and regulations to effect its exercise of authority
under this division and shall keep such rules and regulations on file with the city clerk.

Sec. 16-59. - Appeal procedure Request for appeal hearing. 
(a) Under this division, all complaints will be investigated by the police department. Upon completion of an investigation, the chief of police shall, consistent with state law, notify the complainant by certified letter of the disposition of the complaint. The complainant also shall be informed of his right to appeal the decision of the department to the citizens review board.
(b) All appeals to the citizens review board must be made on a form approved by the board and filed in writing with the city clerk's office. The request must state the reason for the appeal and the nature of the incident and the basis on which the complainant contends that the action taken by the chief of 
police was in error. The citizen may seek the assistance of the community relations committee in
drafting and filing his appeal. The citizen must file this appeal within seventhirty (30) calendar days of receiving written notice of the disposition of the complaint. The citizen must provide a valid current address for the purpose of all notifications required to be made pursuant to this division.
(c) Upon receiving a request for an appeal hearing, the chairperson of the board shall direct the chief of police to prepare a summary ofdeliver the entire internal affairs case and forward the summaryfile to the chairperson city clerk for delivery to the members of the citizens review board. A meeting of the board will be held to discuss theThe chairperson may request for appeal. additional information from the complainant if deemed necessary. 


Sec. 16-60. - Necessity for hearing. 
(a) (d) The board may elect not to hear an appeal under this division if civil, criminal or civil service 
proceedings are instituted and pending. 

Sec. 16-60. Hearing. 
(a) Upon receiving a request for an appeals hearing, a meeting of the board will be held shall hold a 
hearing within 30forty-five (45) calendar days of the request. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the board may elect not to hear an appeal under this division if civil, criminal or civil service proceedings are instituted and pending. 
(b) (b) In The hearing shall be conducted in closed session to ensure compliance with all applicable 
laws, including those related to the confidentiality of criminal information or intelligence and personnel matters. The parties may be represented at the hearing by counsel or any other person of their choice. 
(c) The hearing will begin with the complainant and the department respectively, each in the absence of the other and the other’s representatives, presenting statements of facts to the board. Following 
receipt of the statements of facts, the board may, in its discretion, request additional statements, 
material, or information from the complainant and/or the department. After receiving the parties’ 
statements and any additional material or information provided, the board shall conduct deliberations 
in the absence of the complainant and the department. 
(d) Following the deliberations contemplated in subsection (c), in a public session, and consistent with section 16-58(a)(4), the chairperson shall indicate whether the board has decided to hold a hearing 
conduct additional evidentiary fact-finding and, if so, shall announce the date, time and place of the
hearing.proceedings. In order to conduct additional evidentiary fact-finding, the board must 
determine that there is substantial evidence of error regarding the disposition of the disciplinary 
charges entered by the chief of police. The chairperson shall notify the complainant and other
involved parties in writing of the decision and, if a hearing isevidentiary fact-finding proceedings are 
to be held, also shall advise all parties in writing of the reasons for the decision to hold a
hearingevidentiary fact-finding proceedings. 

(eSec. 16-61. - Hearing procedures. 
(a) If the citizens review board decides to conduct a hearing, itevidentiary fact-finding proceedings, 
those proceedings shall be concluded within 30forty-five (45) calendar days of the date of the
decision to hold an appeal hearing.them pursuant to section 16-60. Should the complainant or the
department desire a hearingto continue the evidentiary fact-finding proceedings to a date other than
that set by the board, the complainant or the department shall submit a written request for a change
of the hearing date of the proceedings, stating the reason for the request. The chairperson shall
approve or disapprove such request, provided that such request is received by the board at least
seven calendar days prior to the date ofset for the hearing. evidentiary fact-finding proceedings. For
good cause, the chairperson may continue the hearingproceedings from time to time, but all appeals
must be concluded within 30sixty (60) calendar days from the date of the decision to hold an appeal 
hearing. The hearing shall be conducted in a closed session, with at least six members of the board 
presentevidentiary fact-finding proceeding. 
(b)f) Evidentiary fact-finding proceedings shall be conducted as follows: 
(1) All witnesses must testify under oath.
(c2) All of the proceedings before the board shall be recorded.
(d3) All parties involved shall have the right to be represented by counsel or any other person
of their choice.
(e) 4) The board shall receive and evaluate evidence which may include testimony of the 
complainant, officers, and other witnesses, and documentary and physical evidence. The
complainant shall offer evidence first in support of his appeal. The department and officer shall
have the right to cross examine the complainant and his witnesses. Thereafter, the department
and officer shall have the right to offer evidence, and the complainant shall have the right to cross
examine the department's and officer's witnesses. At the conclusion of all the evidence, the
complainant or his representative, followed by the department and officer, may make a closing
statement.
(f5) Members of the board may question witnesses or request additional information or further
investigation at any point in the process.
(g6) Members who, in a particular case, have a conflict of interest shall not attend or
participate in the hearingproceedings and decision-making process.
(h) Within ten calendar days after(g) At the conclusion of the hearingevidentiary fact-finding 
proceedings, the board shall issue its written findingsdetermine whether, by the greater weight of 
fact tothe evidence, the chief of police and the city manager alongclearly erred by:
(1) Finding in a disciplinary action that allegations were sustained, not sustained, exonerated or 

unfounded; or

(2) Finding in connection with a recommendation. The findingsthe discharge of fact must a firearm 
that the officer's action was justified, not justified, or accidental. 
(h) Upon conclusion of the appeal process, the complainant shall be supported by a preponderance of 
the evidence and approved by a majoritynotified in writing of the decision of the board who were 
present at the hearing. 
and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the reasons for the decision. 

Sec. 16-61. Reserved. 

Sec. 16-62. - Action by chief of police and city manager.
(a) The chief of police shall review the determination and findings of fact of the citizens review board and any other information at his disposal. The chief of police shall take such action as he deems
appropriate, consistent with state law and city policy. The chief of police will then, within seven
calendar days of the receipt of the board's recommendations, report his decision to the city manager.
(b) The city manager shall review the decision of the chief of police and, within seven calendar days of the receipt of the decision of the chief of police, take such action as he deems appropriate,
consistent with state law, and shall advise the chief of police of any intended action.
(c) The city manager shall notify all parties, including the citizens review board, of the decision of the city manager consistent with state law and city policy. The city manager also shall advise the city council of the outcome of the appeal. Notifications made under this subsection must be made within seven calendar days of the date that the decision of the city manager was initially communicated to the
chief of police.

Sec. 16-63. - City clerk's duties; meeting places; staff. 
(a) Under this division the city clerk shall:
(1) Act as secretary to the citizens review board;
(2) Keep the minutes of its meetings;
(3) Be custodian of all papers and records pertaining to the business of the board; and
(4) Perform such other duties as the board may require.
(b) The city council shall provide sufficient and reasonable rooms and use of public buildings for
meetings and hearings of the board as may be necessary.
(c) The city manager shall assign staff to support the functions of the citizens review board.

Sec. 16-64. - Reports Miscellaneous. 
(a) The citizens review board shall make a semiannual and an annual report of its actions for each
preceding year. These reports shall be kept in the files of the board and a copy delivered to the chief
of police, city manager, city council and the community relations committee.
(b) The board shall receive annually a report from the police chief concerning all complaints against 
department personnel and the disposition of such complaints. 
(c) The board shall recommend changes to the citizens review process to city council as deemed 

appropriate and approved by a majority of the board. 
(d) The board shall promote its visibility within the community by adopting procedures to educate citizens about the board process, and enhance citizen participation through process and procedural changes as deemed appropriate. 
(e) The board shall conduct legal, policy and cultural awareness training for its members, in addition to that provided pursuant to section 16-56(c), on a continuing basis as deemed appropriate. 

Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately and shall apply to all appeals to the Citizens
Review Board filed after the effective date.

Approved as to form: _____________________ (signed by Carolyn D. Johnson)

 City Attorney