Post News . Share Ideas . Inspire Innovation . Get Informed . Get Involved



Thursday, April 18, 2013

EARTH DAY AT CHARLOTTE'S NATURE MUSEUM

Some earth-conscious facts from Charlotte's museums:

  • The average car burns an average of two gallons of fuel a day. Each of those gallons releases 20 pounds of carbon dioxide into the air.
  • If every newspaper was recycled, we could save about 250,000,000 trees each year.
  • Only 11% of the Earth’s surface is used to grow food.
  • By simply recycling one aluminum can, you save enough energy to watch a TV for three hours.

Visit www.charlottenaturemuseum.org for more information 
on this Earth Day event:



Love Your Mother…Earth
Earth Day Play Date at Charlotte Nature Museum
Saturday, April 20, 10:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.


Charlotte, NC – Take root with nature and unearth ways to care for our environment during Charlotte Nature Museum’s April Creature Feature, Earth Day Play Date, Saturday, April 20, from 10:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.


Activities are free with admission and include:

  • Simple ways to reduce your ecological footprint
  • Demonstrations on backyard gardening
  • Special performance by Indian Land’s Eco Warriors 
  • Learn how to make games out of recycled materials
  • Learn about designing outdoor spaces using natural materials
  • Check out the Nissan Leaf: This all-electric vehicle does not require gasoline and helps reduce our dependence on petroleum.
  • Make newspaper pots to fill with seeds and soil
  • Puppet shows

Water bottles and live butterfly garden kits will be available for purchase in Trail’s End Store.


Creature Features, supported by The Guild of Discovery Place and Charlotte Nature Museum, are monthly special events and include crafts, puppet shows and storytelling. Creature Feature activities are free with Museum admission.  

Nature Museum Admission: 
$6 ages two & older, younger-than-two & Members are free.
Parking is free.

Charlotte Nature Museum is located at 1658 Sterling Road, Charlotte. Regular Hours are: Tuesday-Friday 9:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.; Saturday 10:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.; Sunday noon – 5:00 p.m.; and closed on Monday.  This is in the Dilworth Neighborhood, adjacent to Freedom Park.

Charlotte Nature Museum offers visitors the chance to get close to wildlife and walk among free-flying butterflies in Butterfly Pavilion, observe live animals in Creature Cavern, buzz by Insect Alley or just hang out in Our Big Backyard.



*** SEND IN YOUR OWN EARTH DAY EVENTS & ECOLOGICAL TIPS FOR HOME ***
to citynewswatch@gmail.com


Saturday, April 13, 2013

FREE EVENT at DISCOVERY PLACE "Avian Adventure"


Sunday, April 14, 2013
Discovery Place in downtown Charlotte presents an "Avian Adventure" from 2 - 4 p.m.

(Information directly from Discovery Place site:)
Learn all you ever wanted to know about birds with presentations from regional experts, live animal encounters, crafts and more.

You'll get the chance to examine bird nests, bird mounts and eggs from Discovery Place's own collection. Kids can combine feathers and fun to make their very own bird craft to take home. No feeding required!

Exhibits also include:

Carolina Raptor Center (CRC)
Meet a resident raptor and talk with rehabilitators and veterinary staff. Find out how CRC is dedicated to environmental stewardship and the conservation of birds of prey through education, research, and the rehabilitation of injured and orphaned raptors.

Mecklenburg Audubon Society
All about birds: what to look for in different seasons, where to look for specific birds, bird migration, what to feed specific birds at feeders, how to use binoculars, birding etiquette, and citizen science projects.

Habitat and Wildlife Keepers (HAWK)
HAWK is a chapter of the NC Wildlife Federation. Learn how to attract back yard birds by providing food, water, shelter and places to raise young. 

Companion Parrots Re-homed (CPR)
Although companion parrots may be domestic they are not domesticated. Get a bird’s eye view with a parrot and learn about their wild side. 

Wing Haven Gardens & Bird Sanctuary
Over the years many species of birds have been spotted in the garden. Come hear about the birds that visitors at Wing Haven are most likely to see and learn how you might attract them to your garden.

Do Chickens Have Fur?
Meet Silkie Chickens who have fur-like feathers. Get to know Katie Anderson who breeds these unique chickens and find out about raising back yard chickens and harvesting eggs. 

Christopher Baldwin, Educator/Naturalist
Skulls, beaks and talons, oh my! Why do some birds eat seeds and other birds eat meat? Learn how the dietary preference of a bird maps to the shape and function of its beak.

Charlotte Nature Museum
Everybody loves babies! See baby quail and find out about the multitude of birding experiences at Charlotte Nature Museum. 

Birdhouse on the Greenway
Not all nest boxes are the same. Find out why one size does not fit all. Also, learn to match the right feed with the right bird.

Carolina Waterfowl Rescue (CWR)
Carolina Waterfowl Rescue is a non-profit wildlife rescue run by federally-licensed migratory bird rehabilitators specializing in waterfowl. CWR treats more than 2,000 birds a year.

Join us for two short presentations:
• 2:30 p.m. - Case Studies from a Regional Avian Medical/Surgical Referral Center. Presented by Carolina Raptor Center 
• 3:15 p.m. - What’s For Dinner? Set up a buffet in your yard designed to entice specific birds and discourage unwanted pests. Presented by Debbie Foster, Habitat & Wildlife Keepers

FREE admission to event; parking not included.
Please park on Level 3 of the Discovery Place Parking Deck.






Monday, April 1, 2013

HERE COMES RON CARLEE, CHARLOTTE’S NEW CITY MANAGER



This is a picture of Charlotte’s new City Manager, Ron Carlee, riding a county-owned tricycle in his former position in Arlington, VA.  (photo credit: Sun Gazette in Arlington)


Press reports from Charlotte state that Carlee will have a city car and a $290,000 base salary.


Carlee starts his new position on April Fool’s Day and will be sworn in before tonight’s City Council meeting.

Other items on the agenda include:







CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Agenda for Monday, April 1, 2013

5:00 p.m. Dinner
5:15 p.m. Swearing in of City Manager
5:30 p.m. Community Safety: Citizens Review Board Update
6:30 p.m. Economic Development: Collaborative Partnership for Expanding Second Harvest Food Bank
7:00 p.m. Housing & Neighborhood Development: Rental Subsidy Program
7:30 p.m. Citizens Forum Room 267 at the Government Center

Some details, including a hot topic: discussion of the Citizens Review Board, recently in the local paper because of citizens who believe the Board has not been addressing citizen complaints about the Police Department correctly.  A group called C-R-B Reform Now plans to meet at 6:45 p.m. at the Government Center, then go before Council at 7:30.  They will wear all black to identify themselves.  More information can be found at http://www.thelightningrod.org/


TOPIC: Citizens Review Board Update   COUNCIL FOCUS AREA: Community Safety

RESOURCES:
Willie Ratchford, Community Relations,
Gregory West, Citizens Review Board Chairman
Julian Wright, Attorney for the Citizens Review Board
Rodney Monroe, Chief of Police

KEY POINTS:
This presentation will provide an overview of the Citizens Review Board and its
role in CMPD’s disciplinary process. Topics to be covered include:
Responsibilities of the Citizens Review Board
Citizens Review Board Process
Cases Appealed to the Citizens Review Board
CMPD Discipline Process
Changes in CMPD discipline process, departmental policies, and training
Other models for citizen oversight of police

COUNCIL DECISION OR DIRECTION REQUESTED:
None. This presentation is for informational purposes only.

Collaborative Partnership for Expanding the Second Harvest Food Bank - Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina operates out of a County-owned facility on Spratt Street on property adjacent to the City’s Building Services Offices. Second Harvest desires to expand their existing facility and to provide additional parking for delivery trucks and clients.

Rental Subsidy Program - A rental subsidy program would pay the owner of a multi-family housing development or an agency the difference between the tenant’s contribution (30 percent of adjusted income) and the monthly rental rate over a predetermined period of time with the ultimate goal of moving the household to self-sufficiency.


CARLEE'S BLOGS ABOUT CITY MANAGERS

See some of Carlee’s thoughts about municipal management at this Huffington Post blog post “City/County Managers: More than Technocrats.”


Here is a portion of his ideas presented in that post:

While the business of local government is the retail delivery of services, local government is not a business. This was a distinction I always made to new employees when I was a manager and a point that I continue make with my students. I ask them: what is the difference between local government and a private business? The answer lies in the underlying purpose of each entity; in the end success is measured differently.
In a private business the single most important metric is profit, sustained over a long period of time. In contrast, most local government transactions are indirect; payment of services comes through taxes that are collected separately and apart from any direct receipt of a service. There is actually an incentive to keep taxes, and thus revenue, down.
No, local governments are not about making profit; they are about making community.
Local governments do not provide services just for the sake of providing services. A municipal corporation strives for a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts: a community where people want to live, work, do business, visit, and play.
For example, people want a safe community. A safe community, however, is not the result of a single service, such as police. Police are certainly important, but so are the character of the neighborhoods, the schools, the streets, and the parks. A feeling and a reality of safety are achieved through complex interaction across many different services.
At the same time, each of the individual services has to be managed effectively. Like a private corporation, local governments have customers and a responsibility to provide good customer service, have quality control, and provide good value. This is where professional management becomes essential; i.e., in the competent delivery of services.
An encouraging sign can be found in another Carlee’s Huffington Post blog, in this post where he hashes out the case of investigative journalism by the L.A. Times about Bell, CA.  Officials the LA suburb of Bell—a small town of less than 3 square miles and less than 40,000 population--had “…plunder(ed) the city coffers by receiving salaries that were obscene: city administrator $788K; assistant administrator $376K; police chief $457K,” leaving the city nearly broke.  Carlee goes on to praise to the LA Times for exposing the corruption:

As public officials, we have all had our issues with the press, especially when reporting is superficial and slanted. Truthfully, however, as a society we critically need the press. And, public officials who care about honesty also critically need the press, too. The only thing worse than having the press look over your shoulder all the time is not having the press looking over any shoulders any of the time. Unfortunately, professional journalism is an institution at significant risk.


May we hope his actions line up with his words?  Even more, will the local press in Charlotte become more devoted to honest, unbiased evaluation and to investigative reporting? 

Welcome and Good Luck to Ron Carlee.  


Tuesday, March 26, 2013

CNN’s Anderson Cooper REPORT ON $12 Billion High Speed Rail Shell Game




Watch the report by Anderson Cooper including these points:

  • President Obama said to "imagine whisking through towns at speeds of over 100 miles per hour, walking only a few steps to public transportation and ending up just blocks from your destination."
  • Projects were evaluated not by worthiness, but by whether they were "shovel-ready"
  • The Vermont train built with $52 million, and which isn't high-speed, carries about 250 passengers from one end of the state to the other each day.

(NOTE: references to video frames and other are made from this related report found on YouTube which could not be referenced from this blog due to system error.  Cut and paste this url to watch: )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBm0jg6QM90&list=UUvQ2kejN6UkrEVhE5oiYwBw&index=1 

or directly to the President's statement followed by map and LaHood interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=UBm0jg6QM90&list=UUvQ2kejN6UkrEVhE5oiYwBw#t=198s

  • Four years ago, President Obama announced a plan to spend $8 Billion dollars as seed money to get high speed rail off the ground, followed by $1 Billion annually to install Japanese/European-style trains
  • The state of Washington received over $800 Million to improve tracks from Seattle to Portland.  This expenditure resulted in an average trip reduction of 10 minutes. 
  • See the interview with Ray LaHood, outgoing Transportation Secretary (start at about 3:35 minutes to see President Obama’s vision, followed by a talk with La Hood at 4:00 minutes)
  • LaHood says he believes people “like the investments we’re making” and states “there’s so much enthusiasm in America for high speed rail.”
  • La Hood also says train trip speeds have been improved, but that was not the stated goal of the BILLIONS spent.  LaHood could not articulate any plan for real high-speed rail (typically 220 miles per hour with “bullet” trains) anywhere.  He had no answer for “WHEN?” rail
  • One proposal for high-speed rail from San Francisco to Los Angeles has been in planning stages for 10 years, but no track has been laid.  From animations depicted, it would run along the Pacific Ocean on at least a portion of the plans, destroying the coastal views so important to California. 

Cooper and investigative reporter Drew Griffin discuss that people were told our BILLIONS would be spent on real high-speed rail and networks, but this administration is actually investing in slight improvements on slight time improvements for old trains.  In other words, Obama announced a plan he would initiate with no taxpayer input, then spent $Billions on something other than what was promised. 

At the 3:40 mark on the video, see that Charlotte is an endpoint of one proposed section for high speed rail, traveling through Atlanta to Burmingham, Alabama.

Multiple reports have surfaced that Charlotte’s Mayor Anthony Foxx is one of two names in the running to be the new Secretary of Transportation for President Obama.  Based on his history in Charlotte, an appointment to spearhead this type of planning and spending seems like well within his repertoire.

Consider the wildly unpopular tax-people-who-eat-prepared food from grocery stores-or-who-eat-at-restaurants tax Foxx is trying to jam through Charlotte to pay $145 Million for upgrades to billionaire Jerry Richardson’s stadium for the Charlotte Panthers:  Foxx is quoted in the Charlotte Observer that managing negotiations about a football stadium is “like a ball going through a pinball machine.”  His thoughts were given in reply to a letter from “Tom Sasser of Harper’s Restaurant Group and the chair of the Charlotte group, said he supports the city’s latest proposal of a half-cent sales tax that would end after 15 years… This is a unique local issue,” Sasser wrote. “Though we have been told we cannot make a statement opposed to the state board’s opinion, we feel that in this case, at the risk of losing our chapter’s charter, we have to make this statement.”

This delayed endorsement, after initially panning the idea, is not a ringing endorsement. 

Whether Mayor Foxx goes to Washington or not, business will probably continue to operate with local government in this way until more people get informed and involved.

Now see this other important Anderson Cooper report:







Wednesday, March 20, 2013

NOT MOVES LIKE JAGGER, BUT DEFINITELY MOVES

Can't.   Stop.   Watching.

Enjoy. 
Hope his enthusiasm is contagious.
Hope his Speedo is not.


How does the instructor keep a straight face?


Tuesday, March 5, 2013

BILL PROPOSED TO FIX BOTCHED TAX REVALUATION, UPDATE AT MECKBOCC MEETING tonight (3/5/13)


Representative Bill Brawley - the bill's House sponsor explained that the bill called for those who had overpaid to be issued refunds, with interest.  Those who underpaid may be unhappy to know they will receive bills for the new, higher amount owed.  However, no interest will be due from these homeowners.  Brawley said at a press conference 3/4/13 at the Charlotte Government Center, ““The constitution requires that everyone be treated the same and fairly.”
Sen. Jeff Tarte, another co-sponsor of the bill had previously reported he was told “40 percent of the county’s property data was corrupt.”
See the full text of the bill here in original format, or read below.
Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners is expected to get an update on the revaluation process at tonight’s meeting (3/5/13) at the Government Center on Trade Street.  If you want to watch but can’t go in person, check out the live stream on charmeck.org, search “government channel” and click here to watch live. 



TEXT VERSION OF TAX REVALUATION BILL PROPOSAL:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2013
S D
SENATE DRS35077-MCx-25B* (01/23)
Short Title: Require Certain General Reappraisals. (Public)
Sponsors: Senators Tarte and Rucho (Primary Sponsors).
Referred to:
*DRS35077-MCx-25B*
1 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
2 AN ACT TO CORRECT GENERAL REAPPRAISALS RESULTING IN PROPERTY
3 VALUES THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NORTH
4 CAROLINA LAW BY SETTING FORTH THE STEPS REQUIRED TO BRING THE
5 GENERAL REAPPRAISAL INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE
6 PROPERTY TAX MANDATES.
7 Whereas, the Great Recession has had deleterious effects on the economy and,
8 especially, on the housing market; and
9 Whereas, valuation data for a calendar year is used to determine market value for a
10 general reappraisal as of January 1 of the following year; and
11 Whereas, there were a total of 3,825,637 foreclosure filings during the 2010
12 calendar year and 2.23% of all households were in some stage of foreclosure during 2010; and
13 Whereas, annual analysis of the housing market in North Carolina in 2011 shows
14 tax assessments in nearly half of the counties in the State were higher, on average, than actual
15 market values; and
16 Whereas, the General Assembly has previously required accelerated general
17 reappraisals when sales values deviated too much from assessed values, but such countywide
18 analyses can fail to properly account for pockets of improperly valued properties or where
19 properties have values that offset improperly valued properties located elsewhere within the
20 county; and
21 Whereas, these unique and extraordinary conditions have increased the difficulty of
22 accurately appraising real property for tax purposes and increased the number of actual errors
23 in conducting reappraisals; and
24 Whereas, independent, corroborating evidence shows instances of high degrees of
25 inequity in valuations among like properties of a type that is not acceptable by widely accepted
26 mass appraisal standards; and
27 Whereas, independent, corroborating evidence shows, among other things, that there
28 exist concrete examples of erroneous valuations, for example, that resulted both from the
29 values accepted as initial values and from other inequities produced during the property tax
30 appeals process; and
31 Whereas, these examples prove the existence of errors that give rise to significant
32 issues that must be addressed to resolve inequities among like and similar properties; and
33 Whereas, the General Assembly recognizes that the confluence of these issues
34 arising during the time when general reappraisals of real property were occurring has resulted
35 not only in a higher risk but in a higher incidence of assessed values failing to accurately and
36 fairly reflect true market values; Now, therefore,

FILED SENATE
Mar 4, 2013
S.B. 159
PRINCIPAL CLERKGeneral Assembly of North Carolina Session 2013

Page 2 DRS35077-MCx-25B* (01/23)
1 The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
2 SECTION 1. Notwithstanding G.S. 105-287, G.S. 105-325, or any other provision
3 of law restricting the time for which a change in appraisal or valuation may be made, a board of
4 county commissioners shall undertake the measures required by this act if all of the following
5 conditions are met:
6 (1) The county has independent, corroborating evidence that the majority of
7 commercial neighborhoods in the county possess significant issues of
8 inequity.
9 (2) The county has independent, corroborating evidence that, for residential
10 neighborhoods, instances of inequity or erroneous data had a significant
11 impact on the valuation of the neighborhood as a whole.
12 (3) The county's last general reappraisal was performed for the 2008 tax year,
13 2009 tax year, 2010 tax year, 2011 tax year, or 2012 tax year.
14 (4) The independent, corroborating evidence resulted from a review performed
15 by a qualified appraisal company selected and retained by the county and
16 registered with the Department of Revenue and had a sample size of no less
17 than 375 properties, the relevant characteristics of which were reviewed on
18 location at the property.
19 SECTION 2. If all of the conditions of Section 1 of this act are met, a board of
20 county commissioners shall either (i) conduct a reappraisal, using no less than one person
21 certified by the Department of Revenue for mass valuations per 4,250 parcels, pursuant to
22 G.S. 105-286 within 18 months, applicable to all tax years from and including the tax year
23 when the last general reappraisal was performed pursuant to G.S. 105-286 or (ii) have a
24 qualified appraisal company conduct a total review of all the values in the county by
25 neighborhoods and make recommendations as to the true value of the properties as of January 1
26 of the year of the last general reappraisal performed pursuant to G.S. 105-286. After the
27 reappraisal or review required by this section is complete, the board of county commissioners
28 shall make any change on the abstracts and tax records to ensure that the assessed values of
29 incorrectly appraised properties in the county reflect the true values of those properties
30 effective for the year of the last general reappraisal performed pursuant to G.S. 105-286 and
31 shall apply the adjusted values for those properties for each tax year until the next general
32 reappraisal for real property is performed by the county pursuant to G.S. 105-286, unless those
33 adjusted values are changed in accordance with G.S. 105-287. In making changes to the
34 abstracts and tax records mandated by this act, the board of county commissioners shall make
35 adjustments for previous errors, prioritized as follows:
36 (1) Adjustments to parcels with errors that resulted in the parcels having a
37 significantly overstated value.
38 (2) Adjustments to parcels with errors that resulted in the parcels having a
39 significantly understated value.
40 (3) Adjustments to parcels with errors that resulted in the parcels having an
41 overstated value.
42 (4) Adjustments to parcels with errors that resulted in the parcels having an
43 understated value.
44 In instances of parcels with errors that resulted in an overpayment of taxes, the
45 governing board shall require that notice of refund and the refund amount be sent to the owner
46 of record as of the date the payment was made.
47 SECTION 3. Interest on taxes paid on parcels with errors that resulted in the
48 parcels having an overstated value shall be calculated as if there was an order of the county
49 board of equalization and review reducing the valuation of property pursuant to
50 G.S. 105-360(e). Additional taxes levied on parcels as a result of errors causing the parcels to General Assembly of North Carolina Session 2013
DRS35077-MCx-25B* (01/23) Page 3
1 have an understated value shall be treated as taxes on discovered property pursuant to
2 G.S. 105-312.
3 SECTION 4. This act is effective when it becomes law. If any provision of this act
4 or its application is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications
5 of this act that can be given effect without the invalid provisions or application, and to this end
6 the provisions of this act are severable.